QUAZAR CS2 stats
Russia · CIS · ratings through 26 Sep 2026
QUAZAR are ranked #90 of 368 CS2 teams, up one place this week, with a rating of 1,627, 3 points above BET-M. They have won 9 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to SINNERS in the NODWIN Clutch Series 12 playoffs on 26 September.
- CS2 rank
- #90
- of 368 teams
- ▲ 1 place this week
- Rating
- 1,627
- range 1,518 to 1,736
- World rank #89
- Last 14 matches
- 9–5
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 63%
- 45–27 on 72 maps
- last 6 months
QUAZAR rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 26 Sep 2026
- No matches 26 Jul to 24 Aug
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep | 1,627 | 1,528 to 1,726 |
| 25 Sep | 1,638 | 1,540 to 1,737 |
| 23 Sep | 1,644 | 1,545 to 1,743 |
| 21 Sep | 1,658 | 1,559 to 1,758 |
| 20 Sep | 1,655 | 1,554 to 1,755 |
| 19 Sep | 1,654 | 1,553 to 1,756 |
| 18 Sep | 1,641 | 1,540 to 1,743 |
| 17 Sep | 1,627 | 1,526 to 1,728 |
| 16 Sep | 1,644 | 1,542 to 1,745 |
| 15 Sep | 1,629 | 1,528 to 1,731 |
| 5 Sep | 1,628 | 1,525 to 1,730 |
| 4 Sep | 1,637 | 1,534 to 1,741 |
| 3 Sep | 1,627 | 1,522 to 1,732 |
| 27 Aug | 1,614 | 1,508 to 1,719 |
| 27 Aug | 1,609 | 1,502 to 1,716 |
| 24 Aug | 1,594 | 1,486 to 1,702 |
| 26 Jul | 1,598 | 1,492 to 1,705 |
| 22 Jul | 1,624 | 1,518 to 1,731 |
| 21 Jul | 1,615 | 1,507 to 1,723 |
| 14 Jul | 1,614 | 1,505 to 1,724 |
| 14 Jul | 1,601 | 1,491 to 1,711 |
| 13 Jul | 1,614 | 1,504 to 1,725 |
| 13 Jul | 1,604 | 1,493 to 1,715 |
| 12 Jul | 1,599 | 1,486 to 1,712 |
| 12 Jul | 1,598 | 1,482 to 1,713 |
| 21 Jun | 1,621 | 1,504 to 1,738 |
| 20 Jun | 1,609 | 1,488 to 1,729 |
| 5 Jun | 1,594 | 1,472 to 1,715 |
| 3 Jun | 1,580 | 1,457 to 1,703 |
| 1 Jun | 1,569 | 1,445 to 1,693 |
QUAZAR recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above QUAZAR's before the match.
Last updated 26 Sep 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug | BASEMENT BOYS | Won 2–1 | 1,609 v 1,559 | −50 |
| 3 Sep | Omega | Won 2–0 | 1,614 v 1,556 | −58 |
| 4 Sep | SINNERS | Won 2–1 | 1,627 v 1,672 | +45 |
| 5 Sep | INFINITE | Lost 1–2 | 1,637 v 1,605 | −32 |
| 15 Sep | Permitta | Won 2–1 | 1,628 v 1,528 | −100 |
| 16 Sep | ex-RUSTEC | Won 2–0 | 1,629 v 1,628 | −1 |
| 17 Sep | BRUTE | Lost 0–2 | 1,644 v 1,591 | −53 |
| 18 Sep | NAVI Junior | Won 2–0 | 1,627 v 1,621 | −6 |
| 19 Sep | Drama | Won 2–0 | 1,641 v 1,608 | −33 |
| 20 Sep | G2 Ares | Won 2–1 | 1,654 v 1,538 | −116 |
| 21 Sep | Black Phoenix | Won 2–1 | 1,655 v 1,598 | −57 |
| 23 Sep | Misa | Lost 1–2 | 1,658 v 1,527 | −131 |
| 25 Sep | Butterfly | Lost 1–2 | 1,644 v 1,665 | +21 |
| 26 Sep | SINNERS | Lost 0–2 | 1,638 v 1,699 | +61 |
QUAZAR recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–2
NODWIN Clutch Series 12
Playoffs
- Dust2 6–13
- Cache 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,638 v 1,699
- 1–2
CCT Europe 2026 Series 9
Playoffs
- Cache 13–10
- Dust2 6–13
- Nuke 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,644 v 1,665
- 1–2
European Pro League Series 9
Playoffs
- Nuke 13–3
- Anubis 4–13
- Cache 12–16
Ratings going in: 1,658 v 1,527
- 2–1
NODWIN Clutch Series 12
Group Stage
- Dust2 4–13
- Cache 13–7
- Nuke 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,655 v 1,598
- 2–1
CCT Europe 2026 Series 9
Group Stage
- Inferno 7–13
- Cache 13–6
- Mirage 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,654 v 1,538
- 2–0
NODWIN Clutch Series 12
Group Stage
- Inferno 13–4
- Anubis 13–7
Ratings going in: 1,641 v 1,608
- 2–0
CCT Europe 2026 Series 9
Group Stage
- Dust2 13–3
- Nuke 13–5
Ratings going in: 1,627 v 1,621
- 0–2
NODWIN Clutch Series 12
Group Stage
- Anubis 14–16
- Mirage 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,644 v 1,591
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are QUAZAR first.
QUAZAR CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuke | 1510–5 · 67% | 64.1%▲ +8.1 · 153 rounds | 45.3%▲ +1.3 · 172 rounds | 5of 29 | 2of 29 |
| Cache | 148–6 · 57% | 53.4%▲ +1.0 · 146 rounds | 57.4%▲ +9.9 · 176 rounds | 8of 29 | 1of 29 |
| Dust2 | 137–6 · 54% | 54.3%▲ +3.2 · 116 rounds | 46.5%▼ −2.4 · 142 rounds | 0of 29 | 12of 29 |
| Anubis | 128–4 · 67% | 60.4%▲ +11.3 · 139 rounds | 46.5%▼ −4.3 · 129 rounds | 7of 29 | 4of 29 |
| Mirage | 128–4 · 67% | 57.5%▲ +3.2 · 106 rounds | 54.0%▲ +8.4 · 137 rounds | 8of 29 | 2of 29 |
| Inferno | 64–2 · 67% | 54.3%▲ +2.7 · 70 rounds | 52.7%▲ +4.3 · 74 rounds | 0of 29 | 12of 29 |
| Ancient | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 29 | 25of 29 |
- Nuke15 played · 10–5 · 67%CT rounds64.1%▲ +8.1 · 153 roundsT rounds45.3%▲ +1.3 · 172 rounds
Picked 5 of 29 · Banned 2 of 29
- Cache14 played · 8–6 · 57%CT rounds53.4%▲ +1.0 · 146 roundsT rounds57.4%▲ +9.9 · 176 rounds
Picked 8 of 29 · Banned 1 of 29
- Dust213 played · 7–6 · 54%CT rounds54.3%▲ +3.2 · 116 roundsT rounds46.5%▼ −2.4 · 142 rounds
Picked 0 of 29 · Banned 12 of 29
- Anubis12 played · 8–4 · 67%CT rounds60.4%▲ +11.3 · 139 roundsT rounds46.5%▼ −4.3 · 129 rounds
Picked 7 of 29 · Banned 4 of 29
- Mirage12 played · 8–4 · 67%CT rounds57.5%▲ +3.2 · 106 roundsT rounds54.0%▲ +8.4 · 137 rounds
Picked 8 of 29 · Banned 2 of 29
- Inferno6 played · 4–2 · 67%CT rounds54.3%▲ +2.7 · 70 roundsT rounds52.7%▲ +4.3 · 74 rounds
Picked 0 of 29 · Banned 12 of 29
- Ancient0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 29 · Banned 25 of 29
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
QUAZAR playstyle
Six round-level rates from 1,560 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is QUAZAR; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 57.8% | 9th of 31 | 55.8% |
| T round win rate | 50.4% | 10th of 31 | 48.8% |
| Pistol rounds won | 55.6% | 5th of 31 | 52.5% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 75.1% | 12th of 31 | 73.8% |
| Opening duels won | 52.1% | 12th of 31 | 51.5% |
| Clutches won | 16.1% | 1st of 31 | 12.8% |
QUAZAR roster
The players in QUAZAR's most recent match, on 26 Sep 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- newtRU90 maps
- ADR
- 74.1
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 0.99
- gehjiRU89 maps
- ADR
- 77.0
- KAST
- 73%
- K/D
- 1.05
- kaioriRU89 maps
- ADR
- 72.0
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.17
- Ne1XXXRU89 maps
- ADR
- 81.0
- KAST
- 76%
- K/D
- 1.10
- PoryaRU72 maps
- ADR
- 76.9
- KAST
- 76%
- K/D
- 1.06
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 26 Sep 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
QUAZAR head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against five regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus QUAZAR's going into the match.
- SINNERS1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 53 higher on average
Last:
- Misa1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 118 lower on average
Last:
- BRUTE1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 67 lower on average
Last:
- INFINITE1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 78 lower on average
Last:
- HOTU1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 83 higher on average
Last:
QUAZAR have beaten SINNERS once in 2, most recently losing on 26 September.
Teams near QUAZAR in the CS2 rankings
Top teams in CIS
- #3Spirit
- #6Aurora
- #9BetBoom
- #10Nemiga
- #18PARIVISION
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read QUAZAR's CS2 stats
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.