RBLS CS2 stats
RBLS are ranked #80 of 371 CS2 teams, up 32 places this week, with a rating of 1,642, 5 points above FORZE Reload. They have won 9 of their last 14 matches, most recently 2–1 against PCIFIC in the ESL Challenger League Season 52: Europe - Cup 10 playoffs on 5 November.
Ratings through 5 Nov 2026
- CS2 rankof 371 teams, up 32 places this week
- #80
- Ratingrange 1,537 to 1,747. World rank #86
- 1,642
- Last 14 matcheswon and lost since 24 Sep
- 9–5
- Map win rate26–17 on 43 maps, last 6 months
- 60%
RBLS rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
RBLS' rating rose from a low of 1,592 on 22 May to 1,642, its highest in the last six months. Their rating only changes when they play, and they had two breaks of more than three weeks without a match, the longest between 22 May and 17 September.
Last updated 5 Nov 2026
- No matches 22 May to 17 Sep
- No matches 8 Oct to 3 Nov
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov | 1,642 | 1,538 to 1,745 |
| 5 Nov | 1,637 | 1,532 to 1,742 |
| 4 Nov | 1,624 | 1,518 to 1,729 |
| 3 Nov | 1,614 | 1,509 to 1,719 |
| 8 Oct | 1,599 | 1,494 to 1,705 |
| 7 Oct | 1,613 | 1,506 to 1,721 |
| 7 Oct | 1,603 | 1,497 to 1,710 |
| 7 Oct | 1,601 | 1,496 to 1,706 |
| 7 Oct | 1,607 | 1,503 to 1,711 |
| 7 Oct | 1,600 | 1,497 to 1,703 |
| 27 Sep | 1,609 | 1,507 to 1,711 |
| 27 Sep | 1,625 | 1,523 to 1,727 |
| 26 Sep | 1,638 | 1,536 to 1,740 |
| 24 Sep | 1,629 | 1,528 to 1,731 |
| 24 Sep | 1,624 | 1,520 to 1,727 |
| 19 Sep | 1,617 | 1,515 to 1,719 |
| 17 Sep | 1,625 | 1,522 to 1,729 |
| 17 Sep | 1,613 | 1,510 to 1,716 |
| 17 Sep | 1,599 | 1,495 to 1,704 |
| 22 May | 1,592 | 1,489 to 1,696 |
| 22 May | 1,611 | 1,507 to 1,715 |
| 22 May | 1,622 | 1,518 to 1,726 |
| 21 May | 1,613 | 1,510 to 1,716 |
| 21 May | 1,620 | 1,518 to 1,722 |
| 21 May | 1,614 | 1,513 to 1,716 |
RBLS recent form
The last 14 matches, oldest on the left. A filled square is a win and an outlined square is a loss.
Last updated 5 Nov 2026
- 24 Sep: won 2–1 against BASEMENT BOYS
- 26 Sep: won 2–0 against Nordic Partners
- 27 Sep: lost 0–2 against SAW
- 27 Sep: lost 0–2 against INFINITE
- 7 Oct: lost 0–1 against Lazer Cats
- 7 Oct: won 1–0 against NAVI Junior
- 7 Oct: lost 0–1 against Sangal
- 7 Oct: won 1–0 against Famalicão
- 7 Oct: won 1–0 against SAW
- 8 Oct: lost 1–2 against G2 Ares
- 3 Nov: won 2–0 against PCIFIC
- 4 Nov: won 2–0 against benched gods
- 5 Nov: won 2–0 against mellren
- 5 Nov: won 2–1 against PCIFIC
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Sep | BASEMENT BOYS | Won 2–1 | 1,624 v 1,598 | −26 |
| 26 Sep | Nordic Partners | Won 2–0 | 1,629 v 1,479 | −150 |
| 27 Sep | SAW | Lost 0–2 | 1,638 v 1,690 | +52 |
| 27 Sep | INFINITE | Lost 0–2 | 1,625 v 1,574 | −51 |
| 7 Oct | Lazer Cats | Lost 0–1 | 1,609 v 1,550 | −59 |
| 7 Oct | NAVI Junior | Won 1–0 | 1,600 v 1,594 | −6 |
| 7 Oct | Sangal | Lost 0–1 | 1,607 v 1,690 | +83 |
| 7 Oct | Famalicão | Won 1–0 | 1,601 v 1,259 | −342 |
| 7 Oct | SAW | Won 1–0 | 1,603 v 1,682 | +79 |
| 8 Oct | G2 Ares | Lost 1–2 | 1,613 v 1,522 | −91 |
| 3 Nov | PCIFIC | Won 2–0 | 1,599 v 1,575 | −24 |
| 4 Nov | benched gods | Won 2–0 | 1,614 v 1,473 | −141 |
| 5 Nov | mellren | Won 2–0 | 1,624 v 1,561 | −63 |
| 5 Nov | PCIFIC | Won 2–1 | 1,637 v 1,595 | −42 |
RBLS recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
| Opponent | Date | Event | Result | Maps, RBLS first | Ratings going in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIFIC | ESL Challenger League Season 52: Europe - Cup 10Playoffs | Won2–1 |
| 1,637 v 1,595 | |
| mellren | ESL Challenger League Season 52: Europe - Cup 10Playoffs | Won2–0 |
| 1,624 v 1,561 | |
| benched gods | ESL Challenger League Season 52: Europe - Cup 10Playoffs | Won2–0 |
| 1,614 v 1,473 | |
| PCIFIC | ESL Challenger League Season 52: Europe - Cup 10Group C | Won2–0 |
| 1,599 v 1,575 | |
| G2 Ares | Roman Imperium Cup IXPlay-In | Lost1–2 |
| 1,613 v 1,522 | |
| SAW | Roman Imperium Cup IXGroup B | Won1–0 |
| 1,603 v 1,682 | |
| Famalicão | Roman Imperium Cup IXGroup B | Won1–0 |
| 1,601 v 1,259 | |
| Sangal | Roman Imperium Cup IXGroup B | Lost0–1 |
| 1,607 v 1,690 |
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are RBLS first.
RBLS CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | Won | CT rounds won | T rounds won | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuke | 11 | 64%7–4 | 66.7%CT gap to other teams +10.9117 rounds | 39.8%T gap to other teams −4.4123 rounds | 3of 15 | 2of 15 |
| Ancient | 8 | 63%5–3 | 54.3%CT gap to other teams +1.481 rounds | 48.1%T gap to other teams +1.081 rounds | 1of 15 | 3of 15 |
| Dust2 | 8 | 63%5–3 | 63.5%CT gap to other teams +12.374 rounds | 47.4%T gap to other teams −1.478 rounds | 3of 15 | 1of 15 |
| Inferno | 6 | 67%4–2 | 54.8%CT gap to other teams +3.473 rounds | 46.3%T gap to other teams −2.467 rounds | 1of 15 | 2of 15 |
| Anubis | 5 | 40%2–3 | 62.3%CT gap to other teams +13.053 rounds | 49.1%T gap to other teams −1.653 rounds | 2of 15 | 3of 15 |
| Cache | 5 | 60%3–2 | 62.9%CT gap to other teams +10.762 rounds | 51.1%T gap to other teams +3.445 rounds, low sample | 0of 15 | 6of 15 |
| Mirage | 0 | – | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 15 | 14of 15 |
One map wonOne map lostRound rates show the gap to other teams on that map and side, in pointsPicks and bans from 15 recorded vetoes
Retired maps are not shown; RBLS also picked Overpass once in this period. A pick is a map RBLS chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. Vetoes are recorded for 15 of their 26 matches.
RBLS playstyle
Six round-level rates from 953 recorded rounds in the last six months. Each square is one top-ranked team, best on the left; the large square is RBLS.
- 61.3%2nd of 31, median 56.0%
CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side - 45.7%29th of 31, median 48.8%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side - 52.7%11th of 31, median 51.5%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half - 77.1%4th of 31, median 73.9%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill - 50.1%24th of 31, median 51.2%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round - 14.3%4th of 31, median 12.7%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
RBLS rank second of 31 on CT rounds.
RBLS roster
| Player | Maps | ADR | KAST | K/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IcarusPT | 104 | 68.6 | 72% | 0.90 |
| stadodoPT | 104 | 70.7 | 73% | 1.09 |
| aragornNPT | 75 | 70.4 | 72% | 0.85 |
| arrozdocePT | 61 | 68.2 | 71% | 0.94 |
| ShrPT | 36 | 84.3 | 75% | 1.33 |
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 5 Nov 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
RBLS head-to-head record
| Opponent | Record | Meetings, oldest first |
|---|---|---|
| SAW | 2–1 | 3 meetings · opponent rated 80 higher on average. Last met |
| Sangal | 2–4 | 6 meetings · opponent rated 82 higher on average. Last met |
| Sashi | 3–1 | 4 meetings · opponent rated 15 higher on average. Last met |
| Aurora | 0–5 | 5 meetings · opponent rated 111 higher on average. Last met |
| B8 | 1–3 | 4 meetings · opponent rated 81 higher on average. Last met |
Every meeting in the last three years against five regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus RBLS' going into the match.
RBLS have beaten SAW twice in 3, most recently winning on 7 October.
Teams near RBLS in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #77EYEBALLERS
- #78QUAZAR
- #79FORZE Reload
- #81WBT Academy
- #82INOX Division
- #83Butterfly
Top teams in Europe
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read RBLS' CS2 stats
This map pool is one API call
RBLS' record on each map, from the team maps endpoint of the CS2 API.
The team maps endpoint needs a paid plan, from $99 a month. A free sandbox key reads a fixed sample of past matches, to try the API first.
$ curl -G -H "Authorization: Bearer $ESPORTSODDS_API_KEY" \ -d window=6m -d era=cs2 -d active=true \ https://api.esportsodds.gg/v1/cs2/teams/rebels-gaming-cs/maps { "data": [ {"map_name": "de_inferno", "played": 6, "wins": 4}, {"map_name": "de_nuke", "played": 11, "wins": 7}, {"map_name": "de_ancient", "played": 8, "wins": 5} ], "meta": { "count": 6, "next_cursor": null } }