Back to Back
Brazil · South America · ratings through 16 Oct 2026
Back to Back are ranked #165 of 345 CS2 teams, down five places this week, with a rating of 1,540, 26 points above The Huns. They have won 7 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–1 to Low Cortisol BR in the Gamers Club Masters VII: Open Qualifier #2 on 16 October.
- CS2 rank
- #165
- of 345 teams
- ▼ 5 places this week
- Rating
- 1,540
- range 1,409 to 1,671
- World rank #252
- Last 14 matches
- 7–7
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 50%
- 14–14 on 28 maps
- last 6 months
Back to Back rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
- No matches 12 Aug to 3 Sep
- No matches 12 Sep to 16 Oct
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct | 1,540 | 1,410 to 1,670 |
| 12 Sep | 1,555 | 1,424 to 1,686 |
| 12 Sep | 1,550 | 1,420 to 1,681 |
| 11 Sep | 1,543 | 1,412 to 1,674 |
| 10 Sep | 1,546 | 1,410 to 1,682 |
| 9 Sep | 1,521 | 1,379 to 1,663 |
| 7 Sep | 1,515 | 1,368 to 1,663 |
| 6 Sep | 1,475 | 1,323 to 1,628 |
| 4 Sep | 1,455 | 1,297 to 1,613 |
| 3 Sep | 1,477 | 1,313 to 1,640 |
| 12 Aug | 1,459 | 1,292 to 1,625 |
| 10 Aug | 1,483 | 1,302 to 1,664 |
| 8 Aug | 1,469 | 1,284 to 1,655 |
| 30 Jul | 1,514 | 1,315 to 1,713 |
Back to Back recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Back to Back's before the match.
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Jul | RED Canids Academy | Lost 0–2 | 1,586 v 1,471 | −115 |
| 8 Aug | UNO MILLE | Lost 0–2 | 1,514 v 1,549 | +35 |
| 10 Aug | DAMAJUANA | Won 2–0 | 1,469 v 1,149 | −320 |
| 12 Aug | QUINTESSÊNCIA | Lost 1–2 | 1,483 v 1,455 | −28 |
| 3 Sep | Grêmio | Won 1–0 | 1,459 v 1,442 | −17 |
| 4 Sep | Fluxo | Lost 0–2 | 1,477 v 1,619 | +142 |
| 6 Sep | METANOIA Wolves | Won 2–0 | 1,455 v 1,313 | −142 |
| 7 Sep | Bounty Hunters | Won 2–0 | 1,475 v 1,580 | +105 |
| 9 Sep | paiN | Lost 1–2 | 1,515 v 1,695 | +180 |
| 10 Sep | Galorys | Won 2–1 | 1,521 v 1,633 | +112 |
| 11 Sep | Fluxo | Lost 1–2 | 1,546 v 1,633 | +87 |
| 12 Sep | RUSH | Won 1–0 | 1,543 v 1,398 | −145 |
| 12 Sep | METANOIA Wolves | Won 1–0 | 1,550 v 1,305 | −245 |
| 16 Oct | Low Cortisol BR | Lost 0–1 | 1,555 v 1,436 | −119 |
Back to Back recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–1
Gamers Club Masters VII: Open Qualifier #2
- Dust2 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,555 v 1,436
- 1–0
CCT South America 2026 Series #6: Open Qualifier
- Dust2 13–5
Ratings going in: 1,550 v 1,305
- 1–0
CCT South America 2026 Series #6: Open Qualifier
- Mirage 13–1
Ratings going in: 1,543 v 1,398
- 1–2
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: South American Qualifier
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–8
- Mirage 10–13
- Nuke 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,546 v 1,633
- 2–1
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: South American Qualifier
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–10
- Ancient 10–13
- Nuke 13–7
Ratings going in: 1,521 v 1,633
- 1–2
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: South American Qualifier
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–16
- Nuke 16–13
- Mirage 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,515 v 1,695
- 2–0
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: South American Open Qualifier 2
Playoffs
- Nuke 13–2
- Dust2 13–10
Ratings going in: 1,475 v 1,580
- 2–0
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: South American Open Qualifier 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–4
- Dust2 13–7
Ratings going in: 1,455 v 1,313
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Back to Back first.
Back to Back CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 96–3 · 67% | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 4of 5 | 0of 5 |
| Mirage | 72–5 · 29% | 57.1%▲ +2.5 · 14 rounds · low sample | 33.3%▼ −12.0 · 15 rounds · low sample | 1of 5 | 0of 5 |
| Nuke | 63–3 · 50% | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 5 | 0of 5 |
| Ancient | 31–2 · 33% | 60.0%▲ +7.4 · 10 rounds · low sample | 58.3%▲ +10.9 · 12 rounds · low sample | 0of 5 | 0of 5 |
| Anubis | 11–0 · 100% | 83.3%▲ +34.2 · 6 rounds · low sample | 66.7%▲ +15.8 · 12 rounds · low sample | 0of 5 | 4of 5 |
| Cache | 11–0 · 100% | 83.3%▲ +30.6 · 12 rounds · low sample | 42.9%▼ −4.4 · 7 rounds · low sample | 0of 5 | 4of 5 |
| Inferno | 10–1 · 0% | 66.7%▲ +15.1 · 12 rounds · low sample | 25.0%▼ −23.4 · 12 rounds · low sample | 0of 5 | 2of 5 |
- Dust29 played · 6–3 · 67%CT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 4 of 5 · Banned 0 of 5
- Mirage7 played · 2–5 · 29%CT rounds57.1%▲ +2.5 · 14 rounds · low sampleT rounds33.3%▼ −12.0 · 15 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 5 · Banned 0 of 5
- Nuke6 played · 3–3 · 50%CT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 5 · Banned 0 of 5
- Ancient3 played · 1–2 · 33%CT rounds60.0%▲ +7.4 · 10 rounds · low sampleT rounds58.3%▲ +10.9 · 12 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 5 · Banned 0 of 5
- Anubis1 played · 1–0 · 100%CT rounds83.3%▲ +34.2 · 6 rounds · low sampleT rounds66.7%▲ +15.8 · 12 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 5 · Banned 4 of 5
- Cache1 played · 1–0 · 100%CT rounds83.3%▲ +30.6 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds42.9%▼ −4.4 · 7 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 5 · Banned 4 of 5
- Inferno1 played · 0–1 · 0%CT rounds66.7%▲ +15.1 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds25.0%▼ −23.4 · 12 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 5 · Banned 2 of 5
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
Back to Back playstyle
Six round-level rates from 112 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Back to Back; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 68.5% | 1st of 31 | 55.8% |
| T round win rate | 44.8% | 28th of 31 | 49.0% |
| Pistol rounds won | 50.0% | 22nd of 31 | 52.8% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 78.0% | 3rd of 31 | 73.6% |
| Opening duels won | 53.2% | 9th of 31 | 51.7% |
| Clutches won | 17.2% | 1st of 31 | 13.1% |
Back to Back roster
The players in Back to Back's most recent match, on 12 Aug 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- pesadeloBR99 maps
- ADR
- 76.4
- KAST
- 70%
- K/D
- 0.92
- clon7BR67 maps
- ADR
- 72.4
- KAST
- 73%
- K/D
- 0.95
- fokiuBR39 maps
- ADR
- 75.3
- KAST
- 75%
- K/D
- 1.03
- perezBR35 maps
- ADR
- 74.1
- KAST
- 72%
- K/D
- 1.09
- paziniBR22 maps
- ADR
- 70.0
- KAST
- 76%
- K/D
- 0.96
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 12 Aug 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
Back to Back head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against three regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Back to Back's going into the match.
3 meetings · opponent rated 6 lower on average
Last:
- Fluxo0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 114 higher on average
Last:
- DASH0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 30 lower on average, over 1 rated meeting
Last:
Back to Back have beaten METANOIA Wolves in all 3 of their meetings, most recently winning on 12 September.
Teams near Back to Back in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #162Spirit Academy Green
- #163Atreides
- #164The Huns
- #166Phantom Academy
- #167Misa
- #168MOUZ NXT
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.