Bounty Hunters
Brazil · South America · ratings through 12 Oct 2026
Bounty Hunters are ranked #115 of 348 CS2 teams, up nine places this week, with a rating of 1,588, 9 points below BRUTE. They have won 6 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 1–2 to Galorys in the ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3 playoffs on 12 October.
- CS2 rank
- #115
- of 348 teams
- ▲ 9 places this week
- Rating
- 1,588
- range 1,488 to 1,688
- World rank #96
- Last 14 matches
- 6–8
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 56%
- 84–67 on 151 maps
- last 6 months
Bounty Hunters rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
- No matches 24 May to 27 Jun
- No matches 29 Jul to 25 Aug
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct | 1,588 | 1,488 to 1,687 |
| 11 Oct | 1,592 | 1,492 to 1,693 |
| 10 Oct | 1,581 | 1,481 to 1,682 |
| 8 Oct | 1,597 | 1,496 to 1,697 |
| 7 Oct | 1,584 | 1,484 to 1,685 |
| 4 Oct | 1,572 | 1,472 to 1,672 |
| 3 Oct | 1,584 | 1,484 to 1,684 |
| 27 Sep | 1,568 | 1,469 to 1,668 |
| 26 Sep | 1,571 | 1,471 to 1,671 |
| 25 Sep | 1,580 | 1,480 to 1,681 |
| 24 Sep | 1,569 | 1,469 to 1,669 |
| 24 Sep | 1,581 | 1,480 to 1,682 |
| 23 Sep | 1,592 | 1,491 to 1,693 |
| 23 Sep | 1,607 | 1,507 to 1,708 |
| 22 Sep | 1,597 | 1,497 to 1,697 |
| 20 Sep | 1,595 | 1,496 to 1,694 |
| 19 Sep | 1,607 | 1,508 to 1,705 |
| 18 Sep | 1,590 | 1,492 to 1,688 |
| 17 Sep | 1,580 | 1,481 to 1,679 |
| 17 Sep | 1,578 | 1,478 to 1,678 |
| 16 Sep | 1,578 | 1,478 to 1,678 |
| 16 Sep | 1,567 | 1,467 to 1,667 |
| 7 Sep | 1,562 | 1,463 to 1,661 |
| 6 Sep | 1,580 | 1,481 to 1,678 |
| 6 Sep | 1,574 | 1,475 to 1,674 |
| 6 Sep | 1,587 | 1,488 to 1,686 |
| 5 Sep | 1,571 | 1,472 to 1,670 |
| 5 Sep | 1,559 | 1,460 to 1,658 |
| 4 Sep | 1,567 | 1,468 to 1,666 |
| 3 Sep | 1,562 | 1,463 to 1,662 |
| 3 Sep | 1,558 | 1,459 to 1,656 |
| 27 Aug | 1,548 | 1,451 to 1,646 |
| 26 Aug | 1,560 | 1,463 to 1,657 |
| 25 Aug | 1,574 | 1,477 to 1,671 |
| 29 Jul | 1,563 | 1,467 to 1,660 |
| 28 Jul | 1,567 | 1,469 to 1,664 |
| 24 Jul | 1,573 | 1,475 to 1,671 |
| 18 Jul | 1,577 | 1,478 to 1,675 |
| 17 Jul | 1,577 | 1,478 to 1,676 |
| 16 Jul | 1,591 | 1,492 to 1,690 |
| 15 Jul | 1,574 | 1,475 to 1,673 |
| 11 Jul | 1,571 | 1,472 to 1,671 |
| 9 Jul | 1,584 | 1,484 to 1,684 |
| 9 Jul | 1,587 | 1,486 to 1,688 |
| 8 Jul | 1,579 | 1,477 to 1,681 |
| 7 Jul | 1,568 | 1,466 to 1,670 |
| 5 Jul | 1,569 | 1,466 to 1,672 |
| 4 Jul | 1,581 | 1,480 to 1,683 |
| 4 Jul | 1,598 | 1,497 to 1,700 |
| 27 Jun | 1,592 | 1,492 to 1,693 |
| 24 May | 1,608 | 1,508 to 1,708 |
| 24 May | 1,596 | 1,496 to 1,696 |
| 23 May | 1,585 | 1,486 to 1,685 |
| 22 May | 1,574 | 1,475 to 1,674 |
| 9 May | 1,577 | 1,477 to 1,677 |
| 4 May | 1,584 | 1,483 to 1,685 |
| 3 May | 1,577 | 1,476 to 1,677 |
| 2 May | 1,578 | 1,477 to 1,679 |
| 2 May | 1,562 | 1,461 to 1,663 |
| 1 May | 1,570 | 1,469 to 1,672 |
| 30 Apr | 1,557 | 1,455 to 1,659 |
| 29 Apr | 1,549 | 1,448 to 1,650 |
| 28 Apr | 1,536 | 1,435 to 1,638 |
| 27 Apr | 1,524 | 1,423 to 1,625 |
| 26 Apr | 1,523 | 1,421 to 1,626 |
| 25 Apr | 1,529 | 1,426 to 1,633 |
| 24 Apr | 1,523 | 1,421 to 1,625 |
| 24 Apr | 1,519 | 1,417 to 1,620 |
Bounty Hunters recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Bounty Hunters' before the match.
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Sep | Keyd Stars | Won 2–0 | 1,597 v 1,490 | −107 |
| 23 Sep | Turma do Pagode | Lost 1–2 | 1,607 v 1,586 | −21 |
| 24 Sep | paiN | Lost 0–2 | 1,592 v 1,686 | +94 |
| 24 Sep | Yawara | Lost 1–2 | 1,581 v 1,491 | −90 |
| 25 Sep | Yawara | Won 2–0 | 1,569 v 1,503 | −66 |
| 26 Sep | Imperial | Lost 0–2 | 1,580 v 1,706 | +126 |
| 27 Sep | Galorys | Lost 1–2 | 1,571 v 1,641 | +70 |
| 3 Oct | Mira | Won 2–0 | 1,568 v 1,662 | +94 |
| 4 Oct | Turma do Pagode | Lost 0–2 | 1,584 v 1,631 | +47 |
| 7 Oct | Procyon | Won 2–0 | 1,572 v 1,528 | −44 |
| 8 Oct | ALKA | Won 2–0 | 1,584 v 1,535 | −49 |
| 10 Oct | LP | Lost 0–2 | 1,597 v 1,570 | −27 |
| 11 Oct | BORRACHEIROS | Won 2–0 | 1,581 v 1,495 | −86 |
| 12 Oct | Galorys | Lost 1–2 | 1,592 v 1,635 | +43 |
Bounty Hunters recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 1–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Cache 6–13
- Ancient 13–9
- Nuke 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,592 v 1,635
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–5
- Ancient 13–10
Ratings going in: 1,581 v 1,495
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Nuke 2–13
- Ancient 20–22
Ratings going in: 1,597 v 1,570
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–6
- Nuke 16–14
Ratings going in: 1,584 v 1,535
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Anubis 13–9
- Nuke 13–5
Ratings going in: 1,572 v 1,528
- 0–2
CCT South America 2026 Series 6
Playoffs
- Mirage 1–13
- Ancient 17–19
Ratings going in: 1,584 v 1,631
- 2–0Mira
CCT South America 2026 Series 6
Playoffs
- Nuke 16–13
- Dust2 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,568 v 1,662
- 1–2
FERJEE In House Season 2
Decider
- Cache 13–7
- Ancient 8–13
- Nuke 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,571 v 1,641
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Bounty Hunters first.
Bounty Hunters CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
Inferno is a permanent ban
Bounty Hunters banned Inferno in 56 of their 60 recorded vetoes in the last six months, and played it once, a win. Vetoes are recorded for 60 of their 69 matches.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 3619–17 · 53% | 54.8%▲ +0.3 · 323 rounds | 42.9%▼ −2.6 · 347 rounds | 15of 60 | 1of 60 |
| Ancient | 2912–17 · 41% | 54.1%▲ +1.4 · 296 rounds | 42.4%▼ −5.0 · 290 rounds | 10of 60 | 2of 60 |
| Nuke | 2919–10 · 66% | 58.7%▲ +3.1 · 230 rounds | 48.1%▲ +3.8 · 291 rounds | 15of 60 | 2of 60 |
| Cache | 2414–10 · 58% | 48.7%▼ −4.0 · 199 rounds | 57.0%▲ +9.9 · 228 rounds | 17of 60 | 1of 60 |
| Dust2 | 2011–9 · 55% | 59.7%▲ +8.6 · 206 rounds | 48.8%▼ −0.1 · 162 rounds | 0of 60 | 20of 60 |
| Anubis | 128–4 · 67% | 56.7%▲ +7.6 · 104 rounds | 51.7%▲ +0.9 · 118 rounds | 0of 60 | 30of 60 |
| Inferno | 11–0 · 100% | 91.7%▲ +40.1 · 12 rounds · low sample | 33.3%▼ −15.1 · 6 rounds · low sample | 0of 60 | 56of 60 |
- Mirage36 played · 19–17 · 53%CT rounds54.8%▲ +0.3 · 323 roundsT rounds42.9%▼ −2.6 · 347 rounds
Picked 15 of 60 · Banned 1 of 60
- Ancient29 played · 12–17 · 41%CT rounds54.1%▲ +1.4 · 296 roundsT rounds42.4%▼ −5.0 · 290 rounds
Picked 10 of 60 · Banned 2 of 60
- Nuke29 played · 19–10 · 66%CT rounds58.7%▲ +3.1 · 230 roundsT rounds48.1%▲ +3.8 · 291 rounds
Picked 15 of 60 · Banned 2 of 60
- Cache24 played · 14–10 · 58%CT rounds48.7%▼ −4.0 · 199 roundsT rounds57.0%▲ +9.9 · 228 rounds
Picked 17 of 60 · Banned 1 of 60
- Dust220 played · 11–9 · 55%CT rounds59.7%▲ +8.6 · 206 roundsT rounds48.8%▼ −0.1 · 162 rounds
Picked 0 of 60 · Banned 20 of 60
- Anubis12 played · 8–4 · 67%CT rounds56.7%▲ +7.6 · 104 roundsT rounds51.7%▲ +0.9 · 118 rounds
Picked 0 of 60 · Banned 30 of 60
- Inferno1 played · 1–0 · 100%CT rounds91.7%▲ +40.1 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds33.3%▼ −15.1 · 6 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 60 · Banned 56 of 60
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
Bounty Hunters playstyle
Six round-level rates from 2,897 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Bounty Hunters; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 55.6% | 16th of 31 | 55.6% |
| T round win rate | 47.3% | 22nd of 31 | 49.3% |
| Pistol rounds won | 53.2% | 15th of 31 | 52.9% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 73.4% | 16th of 31 | 73.4% |
| Opening duels won | 49.6% | 24th of 31 | 51.7% |
| Clutches won | 13.5% | 8th of 31 | 12.7% |
Bounty Hunters roster
The players in Bounty Hunters' most recent match, on 12 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- KAISERAR216 maps
- ADR
- 68.5
- KAST
- 76%
- K/D
- 1.09
- zockUY214 maps
- ADR
- 76.8
- KAST
- 73%
- K/D
- 1.05
- ponterBR192 maps
- ADR
- 69.4
- KAST
- 72%
- K/D
- 0.91
- pepeBR173 maps
- ADR
- 77.6
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.04
- urban0BR80 maps
- ADR
- 74.7
- KAST
- 72%
- K/D
- 0.91
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 12 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
Bounty Hunters head-to-head record
The most recent meetings in the last three years against five regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Bounty Hunters' going into the match.
- Galorys4–6
10 meetings · opponent rated 36 higher on average
Last:
- Imperial3–9
12 meetings (last 10 shown) · opponent rated 133 higher on average
Last:
- Yawara9–2
11 meetings (last 10 shown) · opponent rated 88 lower on average
Last:
- Keyd Stars7–4
11 meetings (last 10 shown) · opponent rated 64 lower on average
Last:
- Fluxo4–5
9 meetings · opponent rated 105 higher on average
Last:
Bounty Hunters have beaten Galorys 4 times in 10, most recently losing on 12 October.
Teams near Bounty Hunters in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #112Nexus
- #113RBLS
- #114BRUTE
- #116Inner Circle Academy
- #117WBT
- #118The Golden Horde
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.