Four Magic
Brazil · South America · ratings through 26 Sep 2026
Four Magic are ranked #237 of 347 CS2 teams, up one place this week, with a rating of 1,471, 48 points above your end. They have won 5 of their last 9 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to BRUTE in the Tipsport Open Cup 2 playoffs on 26 September.
- CS2 rank
- #237
- of 347 teams
- ▲ 1 place this week
- Rating
- 1,471
- range 1,268 to 1,675
- World rank #193
- Last 9 matches
- 5–4
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 62%
- 8–5 on 13 maps
- last 6 months
Four Magic rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 26 Sep 2026
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep | 1,471 | 1,271 to 1,672 |
| 26 Sep | 1,514 | 1,298 to 1,731 |
| 25 Sep | 1,482 | 1,233 to 1,730 |
| 24 Sep | 1,584 | 1,299 to 1,870 |
| 24 Sep | 1,569 | 1,273 to 1,864 |
| 23 Sep | 1,468 | 1,121 to 1,814 |
Four Magic recent form
Each of the last 9 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Four Magic's before the match.
Last updated 26 Sep 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Feb | MIBR | Lost 0–2 | — | — |
| 18 Feb | Yawara | Won 1–0 | 1,379 v 1,458 | +79 |
| 19 Feb | Imperial | Lost 0–2 | 1,379 v 1,672 | +293 |
| 23 Sep | Optibet | Won 2–0 | — | — |
| 24 Sep | INFINITE Talent | Won 2–0 | 1,468 v 1,436 | −32 |
| 24 Sep | 95 Vikings | Won 2–0 | 1,569 v 1,070 | −499 |
| 25 Sep | HAVU | Lost 0–2 | 1,584 v 1,525 | −59 |
| 26 Sep | Optibet | Won 2–1 | 1,482 v 1,487 | +5 |
| 26 Sep | BRUTE | Lost 0–2 | 1,514 v 1,603 | +89 |
Four Magic recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–2
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 1–13
- Dust2 5–13
Ratings going in: 1,514 v 1,603
- 2–1
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–9
- Ancient 9–13
- Dust2 19–16
Ratings going in: 1,482 v 1,487
- 0–2
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 11–13
- Dust2 4–13
Ratings going in: 1,584 v 1,525
- 2–095 Vikings
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Group B
- Cache 13–4
- Ancient 13–5
Ratings going in: 1,569 v 1,070
- 2–0INFINITE Talent
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Group B
- Cache 13–4
- Ancient 13–5
Ratings going in: 1,468 v 1,436
- 2–0
Tipsport Open Cup 2
Group B
- Anubis 13–7
- Ancient 16–12
Ratings going in: 1,312 v —
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 51: South America - Cup 1
Playoffs
- Anubis 5–13
- Mirage 11–13
Ratings going in: 1,379 v 1,672
- 1–0
ESL Challenger League Season 51: South America - Cup 1
Playoffs
—Ratings going in: 1,379 v 1,458
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Four Magic first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.
Four Magic CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 43–1 · 75% | 70.3%▲ +17.7 · 37 rounds · low sample | 51.0%▲ +3.6 · 49 rounds · low sample | 1of 6 | 0of 6 |
| Dust2 | 31–2 · 33% | 41.5%▼ −9.6 · 41 rounds · low sample | 37.9%▼ −11.0 · 29 rounds · low sample | 0of 6 | 0of 6 |
| Mirage | 31–2 · 33% | 50.0%▼ −4.6 · 24 rounds · low sample | 36.1%▼ −9.3 · 36 rounds · low sample | 3of 6 | 1of 6 |
| Cache | 22–0 · 100% | 75.0%▲ +22.3 · 24 rounds · low sample | 80.0%▲ +32.7 · 10 rounds · low sample | 0of 6 | 0of 6 |
| Anubis | 11–0 · 100% | 87.5%▲ +38.3 · 8 rounds · low sample | 50.0%▼ −0.8 · 12 rounds · low sample | 2of 6 | 0of 6 |
| Inferno | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 6 | 6of 6 |
| Nuke | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 6 | 5of 6 |
- Ancient4 played · 3–1 · 75%CT rounds70.3%▲ +17.7 · 37 rounds · low sampleT rounds51.0%▲ +3.6 · 49 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 6 · Banned 0 of 6
- Dust23 played · 1–2 · 33%CT rounds41.5%▼ −9.6 · 41 rounds · low sampleT rounds37.9%▼ −11.0 · 29 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 6 · Banned 0 of 6
- Mirage3 played · 1–2 · 33%CT rounds50.0%▼ −4.6 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds36.1%▼ −9.3 · 36 rounds · low sample
Picked 3 of 6 · Banned 1 of 6
- Cache2 played · 2–0 · 100%CT rounds75.0%▲ +22.3 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds80.0%▲ +32.7 · 10 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 6 · Banned 0 of 6
- Anubis1 played · 1–0 · 100%CT rounds87.5%▲ +38.3 · 8 rounds · low sampleT rounds50.0%▼ −0.8 · 12 rounds · low sample
Picked 2 of 6 · Banned 0 of 6
- Inferno0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 6 · Banned 6 of 6
- Nuke0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 6 · Banned 5 of 6
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
Four Magic playstyle
Six round-level rates from 270 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Four Magic; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 59.7% | 3rd of 31 | 55.7% |
| T round win rate | 46.3% | 25th of 31 | 49.0% |
| Pistol rounds won | 57.7% | 2nd of 31 | 53.3% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 73.6% | 15th of 31 | 73.6% |
| Opening duels won | 52.0% | 14th of 31 | 51.7% |
| Clutches won | 16.1% | 2nd of 31 | 13.1% |
Four Magic roster
The players in Four Magic's most recent match, on 26 Sep 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- GeGoBG76 maps
- ADR
- 64.9
- KAST
- 69%
- K/D
- 0.84
- RELLT23 maps
- ADR
- 64.9
- KAST
- 70%
- K/D
- 0.92
- senseyRO13 maps
- ADR
- 98.5
- KAST
- 77%
- K/D
- 1.34
- statikSDE13 maps
- ADR
- 77.0
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 0.96
- XADELT13 maps
- ADR
- 61.2
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 0.84
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 26 Sep 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
Four Magic head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against one regular opponent, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Four Magic's going into the match.
- Optibet2–0
2 meetings · opponent rated 6 higher on average, over 1 rated meeting
Last:
Four Magic have beaten Optibet in all 2 of their meetings, most recently winning on 26 September.
Teams near Four Magic in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #234XDM
- #235Underworld
- #236your end
- #238train launcher
- #239Ryvex
- #240Legion
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.