MIBR fe CS2 stats
Brazil · South America · ratings through 18 Oct 2026
MIBR fe are ranked #247 of 370 CS2 teams, down four places this week, with a rating of 1,404, 106 points below Chaos Enforcers. They have won 9 of their last 14 matches, most recently 2–0 against YouaremyFrag fem in the WIBR Cup 2026 on 18 October.
- CS2 rank
- #247
- of 370 teams
- ▼ 4 places this week
- Rating
- 1,404
- range 1,277 to 1,530
- World rank #198
- Last 14 matches
- 9–5
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 61%
- 25–16 on 41 maps
- last 6 months
MIBR fe rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 18 Oct 2026
- No matches 26 Jun to 11 Sep
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct | 1,404 | 1,280 to 1,527 |
| 17 Oct | 1,366 | 1,244 to 1,488 |
| 16 Oct | 1,333 | 1,211 to 1,455 |
| 15 Oct | 1,319 | 1,197 to 1,441 |
| 14 Oct | 1,285 | 1,164 to 1,406 |
| 1 Oct | 1,275 | 1,154 to 1,396 |
| 30 Sep | 1,281 | 1,159 to 1,402 |
| 28 Sep | 1,277 | 1,153 to 1,402 |
| 28 Sep | 1,270 | 1,143 to 1,397 |
| 27 Sep | 1,261 | 1,134 to 1,388 |
| 25 Sep | 1,280 | 1,150 to 1,409 |
| 24 Sep | 1,251 | 1,119 to 1,383 |
| 22 Sep | 1,250 | 1,113 to 1,386 |
| 21 Sep | 1,257 | 1,119 to 1,395 |
| 15 Sep | 1,262 | 1,124 to 1,400 |
| 13 Sep | 1,266 | 1,123 to 1,408 |
| 11 Sep | 1,266 | 1,116 to 1,415 |
| 26 Jun | 1,239 | 1,085 to 1,394 |
| 25 Jun | 1,228 | 1,060 to 1,395 |
MIBR fe recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above MIBR fe's before the match.
Last updated 18 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sep | RED Canids Academy | Lost 0–1 | 1,262 v 1,526 | +264 |
| 22 Sep | QUINTESSÊNCIA | Lost 0–2 | 1,257 v 1,575 | +318 |
| 24 Sep | DAMAJUANA | Won 2–1 | 1,250 v 1,139 | −111 |
| 25 Sep | ??? | Won 2–0 | 1,251 v 1,347 | +96 |
| 27 Sep | METANOIA Wolves | Lost 0–2 | 1,280 v 1,349 | +69 |
| 28 Sep | Zetta | Won 2–0 | 1,261 v 1,203 | −58 |
| 28 Sep | Underworld | Lost 1–2 | 1,270 v 1,487 | +217 |
| 30 Sep | Sementes do Mal | Won 2–1 | 1,277 v 1,197 | −80 |
| 1 Oct | Turma do Pagode | Lost 0–2 | 1,281 v 1,616 | +335 |
| 14 Oct | Zero Bala fem | Won 2–0 | 1,275 v 1,078 | −197 |
| 15 Oct | desempleHADAS fem | Won 2–0 | 1,285 v 1,885 | +600 |
| 16 Oct | Underworld | Won 1–0 | 1,319 v 1,443 | +124 |
| 17 Oct | panelasso fem | Won 2–0 | 1,333 v 1,642 | +309 |
| 18 Oct | YouaremyFrag fem | Won 2–0 | 1,366 v 2,020 | +654 |
MIBR fe recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 2–0
WIBR Cup 2026
- Dust2 13–8
- Ancient 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,366 v 2,020
- 2–0
WIBR Cup 2026
- Nuke 13–3
- Ancient 13–2
Ratings going in: 1,333 v 1,642
- 1–0
Gamers Club Liga Série A: October 2026
Group C
- Ancient 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,319 v 1,443
- 2–0
WIBR Cup 2026
- Dust2 13–7
- Ancient 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,285 v 1,885
- 2–0Zero Bala fem
WIBR Cup 2026
- Dust2 13–1
- Anubis 13–1
Ratings going in: 1,275 v 1,078
- 0–2
CCT South America 2026 Series 6
Playoffs
- Anubis 3–13
- Ancient 2–13
Ratings going in: 1,281 v 1,616
- 2–1
CCT South America 2026 Series 6
Group Stage
- Ancient 4–13
- Cache 13–8
- Inferno 13–11
Ratings going in: 1,277 v 1,197
- 1–2
Gamers Club Liga Série A: September 2026
Group C
- Dust2 4–13
- Ancient 26–23
- Cache 11–13
Ratings going in: 1,270 v 1,487
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are MIBR fe first.
MIBR fe CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 1712–5 · 71% | 50.0%▼ −2.9 · 68 rounds | 38.8%▼ −8.3 · 67 rounds | 10of 15 | 0of 15 |
| Dust2 | 85–3 · 63% | 56.5%▲ +5.4 · 23 rounds · low sample | 43.5%▼ −5.4 · 23 rounds · low sample | 1of 15 | 4of 15 |
| Anubis | 53–2 · 60% | 47.2%▼ −2.0 · 36 rounds · low sample | 43.5%▼ −7.3 · 23 rounds · low sample | 4of 15 | 0of 15 |
| Cache | 51–4 · 20% | 44.4%▼ −7.9 · 36 rounds · low sample | 50.0%▲ +2.3 · 28 rounds · low sample | 0of 15 | 5of 15 |
| Inferno | 32–1 · 67% | 58.3%▲ +6.7 · 24 rounds · low sample | 70.6%▲ +22.3 · 17 rounds · low sample | 0of 15 | 1of 15 |
| Nuke | 32–1 · 67% | 58.3%▲ +2.4 · 24 rounds · low sample | 50.0%▲ +5.9 · 22 rounds · low sample | 0of 15 | 5of 15 |
| Mirage | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 15 | 15of 15 |
- Ancient17 played · 12–5 · 71%CT rounds50.0%▼ −2.9 · 68 roundsT rounds38.8%▼ −8.3 · 67 rounds
Picked 10 of 15 · Banned 0 of 15
- Dust28 played · 5–3 · 63%CT rounds56.5%▲ +5.4 · 23 rounds · low sampleT rounds43.5%▼ −5.4 · 23 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 15 · Banned 4 of 15
- Anubis5 played · 3–2 · 60%CT rounds47.2%▼ −2.0 · 36 rounds · low sampleT rounds43.5%▼ −7.3 · 23 rounds · low sample
Picked 4 of 15 · Banned 0 of 15
- Cache5 played · 1–4 · 20%CT rounds44.4%▼ −7.9 · 36 rounds · low sampleT rounds50.0%▲ +2.3 · 28 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 15 · Banned 5 of 15
- Inferno3 played · 2–1 · 67%CT rounds58.3%▲ +6.7 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds70.6%▲ +22.3 · 17 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 15 · Banned 1 of 15
- Nuke3 played · 2–1 · 67%CT rounds58.3%▲ +2.4 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds50.0%▲ +5.9 · 22 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 15 · Banned 5 of 15
- Mirage0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 15 · Banned 15 of 15
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
MIBR fe playstyle
Six round-level rates from 407 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is MIBR fe; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 52.5% | 28th of 31 | 56.0% |
| T round win rate | 47.3% | 24th of 31 | 49.3% |
| Pistol rounds won | 50.0% | 23rd of 31 | 52.5% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 72.5% | 23rd of 31 | 74.2% |
| Opening duels won | 50.4% | 23rd of 31 | 51.5% |
| Clutches won | 12.1% | 20th of 31 | 12.7% |
MIBR fe roster
The players in MIBR fe's most recent match, on 1 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- DANIBR32 maps
- ADR
- 77.5
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 0.95
- GaBiBR32 maps
- ADR
- 65.3
- KAST
- 70%
- K/D
- 0.94
- OlgaBR32 maps
- ADR
- 88.7
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.10
- poppinsBR32 maps
- ADR
- 72.9
- KAST
- 70%
- K/D
- 0.91
- yungherBR32 maps
- ADR
- 70.8
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.20
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 1 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
MIBR fe head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against two regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus MIBR fe's going into the match.
- Underworld1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 171 higher on average
Last:
- Atrix2–1
3 meetings · opponent rated 160 higher on average
Last:
MIBR fe have beaten Underworld once in 2, most recently winning on 16 October.
Teams near MIBR fe in the CS2 rankings
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read MIBR fe's CS2 stats
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then plans from $99/mo, 50,000 requests.