EsportsOdds
Team · Counter-Strike 2

MIBR fe

Brazil · South America · ratings through 1 Oct 2026

MIBR fe are ranked #290 of 348 CS2 teams, down eight places this week, with a rating of 1,275, 22 points below Privateer. They have won 7 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to Turma do Pagode in the CCT South America 2026 Series 6 playoffs on 1 October.

CS2 rank
#290
of 348 teams
▼ 8 places this week
Rating
1,275
range 1,151 to 1,399
World rank #198
Last 14 matches
7–7
last 5
Map win rate
50%
16–16 on 32 maps
last 6 months
Rating

MIBR fe rating history

Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.

Last updated 1 Oct 2026

  • No matches 26 Jun to 11 Sep
  • Peak
  • Low
MIBR fe's rating rose from 1,228 on 25 June to a peak of 1,281 on 30 September and is 1,275 now. Their rating only changes when they play, and they played no matches between 26 June and 11 September.
as of 1 Oct 2026 · 14 ratingsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
14 rating points, 25 June to 1 October
DateRatingRange
1 Oct1,2751,154 to 1,396
30 Sep1,2811,159 to 1,402
28 Sep1,2771,153 to 1,402
28 Sep1,2701,143 to 1,397
27 Sep1,2611,134 to 1,388
25 Sep1,2801,150 to 1,409
24 Sep1,2511,119 to 1,383
22 Sep1,2501,113 to 1,386
21 Sep1,2571,119 to 1,395
15 Sep1,2621,124 to 1,400
13 Sep1,2661,123 to 1,408
11 Sep1,2661,116 to 1,415
26 Jun1,2391,085 to 1,394
25 Jun1,2281,060 to 1,395
Form

MIBR fe recent form

Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above MIBR fe's before the match.

Last updated 1 Oct 2026

  • Win
  • Loss
MIBR fe have won 7 of their last 14 matches and were rated below the opponent in 9 of them. All seven of their losses came against teams rated above them.
as of 1 Oct 2026 · 14 matchesesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
Rating gap is the opponent’s rating minus the team’s, both just before the match
DateOpponentResultRatings going inRating gap
26 JunShimmerWon 3–11,228 v 1,106−122
11 SepLow Cortisol BRWon 1–01,239 v 1,744+505
11 SepHachaWon 2–01,239 v 1,193−46
13 SepRUSHLost 1–21,266 v 1,389+123
15 SepHOLANDA 78Lost 1–21,266 v 1,360+94
21 SepRED Canids AcademyLost 0–11,262 v 1,526+264
22 SepQUINTESSÊNCIALost 0–21,257 v 1,575+318
24 SepDAMAJUANAWon 2–11,250 v 1,139−111
25 Sep???Won 2–01,251 v 1,347+96
27 SepMETANOIA WolvesLost 0–21,280 v 1,349+69
28 SepZettaWon 2–01,261 v 1,203−58
28 SepUnderworldLost 1–21,270 v 1,487+217
30 SepSementes do MalWon 2–11,277 v 1,197−80
1 OctTurma do PagodeLost 0–21,281 v 1,616+335
Results

MIBR fe recent results

The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.

  • 0–2
    Turma do Pagode

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Playoffs

    • Anubis 3–13
    • Ancient 2–13

    Ratings going in: 1,281 v 1,616

  • 2–1
    Sementes do Mal

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Group Stage

    • Ancient 4–13
    • Cache 13–8
    • Inferno 13–11

    Ratings going in: 1,277 v 1,197

  • 1–2
    Underworld

    Gamers Club Liga Série A: September 2026

    Group C

    • Dust2 4–13
    • Ancient 26–23
    • Cache 11–13

    Ratings going in: 1,270 v 1,487

  • 2–0
    Zetta

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Group Stage

    • Ancient 13–3

    Ratings going in: 1,261 v 1,203

  • 0–2
    METANOIA Wolves

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Group Stage

    • Anubis 11–13
    • Dust2 10–13

    Ratings going in: 1,280 v 1,349

  • 2–0
    ???

    Gamers Club Liga Série A: September 2026

    Group C

    • Dust2 13–7
    • Ancient 13–8

    Ratings going in: 1,251 v 1,347

  • 2–1
    DAMAJUANA

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Group Stage

    • Ancient 13–10
    • Cache 6–13
    • Anubis 13–6

    Ratings going in: 1,250 v 1,139

  • 0–2
    QUINTESSÊNCIA

    CCT South America 2026 Series 6

    Group Stage

    • Cache 11–13
    • Ancient 6–13

    Ratings going in: 1,257 v 1,575

Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are MIBR fe first.

Maps

MIBR fe CS2 map pool

The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.

  • Ancient13 played · 8–5 · 62%
    CT rounds
    50.0%▼ −2.6 · 68 rounds
    T rounds
    38.8%▼ −8.6 · 67 rounds

    Picked 5 of 8 · Banned 0 of 8

  • Cache5 played · 1–4 · 20%
    CT rounds
    44.4%▼ −8.3 · 36 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    50.0%▲ +2.7 · 28 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 8 · Banned 0 of 8

  • Dust25 played · 2–3 · 40%
    CT rounds
    56.5%▲ +5.4 · 23 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    43.5%▼ −5.4 · 23 rounds · low sample

    Picked 1 of 8 · Banned 3 of 8

  • Anubis4 played · 2–2 · 50%
    CT rounds
    47.2%▼ −1.9 · 36 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    43.5%▼ −7.4 · 23 rounds · low sample

    Picked 3 of 8 · Banned 0 of 8

  • Inferno3 played · 2–1 · 67%
    CT rounds
    58.3%▲ +6.7 · 24 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    70.6%▲ +22.2 · 17 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 8 · Banned 1 of 8

  • Nuke2 played · 1–1 · 50%
    CT rounds
    58.3%▲ +2.7 · 24 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    50.0%▲ +5.6 · 22 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 8 · Banned 3 of 8

  • Mirage0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 8 · Banned 8 of 8

  • ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
  • ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
  • fewer than 50 rounds
Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map MIBR fe chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. Vetoes are recorded for 8 of their 18 matches.
32 mapsesportsodds.gg
Playstyle

MIBR fe playstyle

Six round-level rates from 407 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is MIBR fe; the dashed line is the median.

CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side
52.5% · 28th of 31 · median 55.6%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side
47.3% · 22nd of 31 · median 49.3%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half
50.0% · 21st of 31 · median 52.8%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill
72.5% · 21st of 31 · median 73.3%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round
50.4% · 22nd of 31 · median 51.7%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
12.1% · 20th of 31 · median 12.7%
MIBR fe's highest placing among 31 top-ranked teams is 20th, on clutches. They are close to the median on rounds won after the first kill and on clutches.
407 roundsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
MIBR fe round-level rates over the last six months
RateValueRank among top-ranked teamsMedian
CT round win rate52.5%28th of 3155.6%
T round win rate47.3%22nd of 3149.3%
Pistol rounds won50.0%21st of 3152.8%
Rounds won after the first kill72.5%21st of 3173.3%
Opening duels won50.4%22nd of 3151.7%
Clutches won12.1%20th of 3112.7%
Roster

MIBR fe roster

The players in MIBR fe's most recent match, on 1 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.

  • DANIBR32 maps
    ADR
    77.5
    KAST
    71%
    K/D
    0.95
  • GaBiBR32 maps
    ADR
    65.3
    KAST
    70%
    K/D
    0.94
  • OlgaBR32 maps
    ADR
    88.7
    KAST
    74%
    K/D
    1.10
  • poppinsBR32 maps
    ADR
    72.9
    KAST
    70%
    K/D
    0.91
  • yungherBR32 maps
    ADR
    70.8
    KAST
    74%
    K/D
    1.20

Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 1 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.

Head to head

MIBR fe head-to-head record

Every meeting in the last three years against one regular opponent, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus MIBR fe's going into the match.

  • Atrix2–1

    3 meetings · opponent rated 160 higher on average

    Last:

MIBR fe have beaten Atrix twice in 3, most recently winning on 29 November 2025.

Explore

Teams near MIBR fe in the CS2 rankings

Closest in the rankings

Top teams in South America

Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.

Pull this CS2 data yourself

Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.

Start freeSee the CS2 API