Team · Counter-Strike 2

Quintessence

Russia · CIS · ratings through 19 Oct 2026

Quintessence are ranked #49 of 363 CS2 teams, having entered the rankings this week, with a rating of 1,833, 110 points above BC.Game. They have won all of their last 7 matches, most recently 2–0 against Falcons Force in the CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8 playoffs on 19 October.

CS2 rank
#49
of 363 teams
new this week
Rating
1,833
range 1,617 to 2,049
Last 7 matches
7–0
last 5
Map win rate
75%
12–4 on 16 maps
last 6 months
Rating

Quintessence rating history

Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.

Last updated 19 Oct 2026

  • No matches 13 Sep to 18 Oct
  • Peak
  • Low
Quintessence's rating rose from 1,600 on 5 September to a peak of 1,863 on 13 September and is 1,833 now. Their rating only changes when they play, and they played no matches between 13 September and 18 October.
as of 19 Oct 2026 · 6 ratingsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
6 rating points, 5 September to 19 October
DateRatingRange
19 Oct1,8331,617 to 2,048
18 Oct1,8091,581 to 2,036
13 Sep1,8631,624 to 2,102
12 Sep1,7961,529 to 2,064
10 Sep1,7521,422 to 2,082
5 Sep1,6001,144 to 2,055
Form

Quintessence recent form

Each of the last 7 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Quintessence's before the match.

Last updated 19 Oct 2026

  • Win
  • Loss
Quintessence have won all of their last 7 matches and were rated above the opponent in 4 of the 5 with both ratings.
as of 19 Oct 2026 · 7 matchesesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
Rating gap is the opponent’s rating minus the team’s, both just before the match
DateOpponentResultRatings going inRating gap
5 SepSabertoothWon 2–1——
7 SepFLXREWon 2–0——
10 SepgothboicliqueWon 2–11,600 v 1,753+153
12 SepTitanFlowWon 2–11,752 v 1,748−4
13 SepTitanFlowWon 2–01,796 v 1,745−51
18 Octbenched godsWon 2–11,863 v 1,450−413
19 OctFalcons ForceWon 2–01,809 v 1,544−265
Results

Quintessence recent results

The latest seven matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.

  • 2–0

    CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8

    Playoffs

    • Cache 13–9
    • Inferno 13–10

    Ratings going in: 1,809 v 1,544

  • 2–1

    CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8

    Playoffs

    • Cache 10–13
    • Dust2 13–10
    • Inferno 13–6

    Ratings going in: 1,863 v 1,450

  • 2–0

    CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9

    Playoffs

    • Dust2 13–9
    • Mirage 13–6

    Ratings going in: 1,796 v 1,745

  • 2–1

    CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9

    Playoffs

    • Cache 12–16
    • Mirage 13–10
    • Inferno 13–6

    Ratings going in: 1,752 v 1,748

  • 2–1

    CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9

    Playoffs

    • Cache 13–10
    • Dust2 13–16
    • Mirage 13–9

    Ratings going in: 1,600 v 1,753

  • 2–0
    FLXRE

    CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9

    Playoffs

    —

    Ratings going in: 1,600 v —

  • 2–1
    Sabertooth

    CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9

    Playoffs

    • Cache 9–13
    • Dust2 13–3
    • Mirage 13–8

    Ratings going in: —

Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Quintessence first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.

Maps

Quintessence CS2 map pool

The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.

  • Cache5 played · 2–3 · 40%
    CT rounds
    62.2%▲ +9.7 · 37 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    33.3%▼ −14.2 · 36 rounds · low sample

    Picked 2 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3

  • Dust24 played · 3–1 · 75%
    CT rounds
    71.4%▲ +20.3 · 21 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    45.8%▼ −3.0 · 24 rounds · low sample

    Picked 1 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3

  • Mirage4 played · 4–0 · 100%
    CT rounds
    54.2%▼ −0.5 · 24 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    72.2%▲ +26.9 · 18 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3

  • Inferno3 played · 3–0 · 100%
    CT rounds
    52.8%▲ +1.2 · 36 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    80.0%▲ +31.6 · 25 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3

  • Ancient0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 2 of 3

  • Anubis0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 3 of 3

  • Nuke0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 1 of 3

  • ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
  • ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
  • fewer than 50 rounds
Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map Quintessence chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. Vetoes are recorded for 3 of their 7 matches.
16 mapsesportsodds.gg
Playstyle

Quintessence playstyle

Six round-level rates from 221 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Quintessence; the dashed line is the median.

CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side
59.3% · 2nd of 31 · median 55.8%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side
54.4% · 3rd of 31 · median 49.0%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half
55.0% · 9th of 31 · median 52.7%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill
78.6% · 2nd of 31 · median 73.9%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round
53.2% · 5th of 31 · median 51.3%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
22.3% · 1st of 31 · median 12.7%
Quintessence rank first of 31 on clutches, second on CT rounds and on rounds won after the first kill, and third on T rounds.
221 roundsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
Quintessence round-level rates over the last six months
RateValueRank among top-ranked teamsMedian
CT round win rate59.3%2nd of 3155.8%
T round win rate54.4%3rd of 3149.0%
Pistol rounds won55.0%9th of 3152.7%
Rounds won after the first kill78.6%2nd of 3173.9%
Opening duels won53.2%5th of 3151.3%
Clutches won22.3%1st of 3112.7%
Roster

Quintessence roster

The players in Quintessence's most recent match, on 19 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.

  • dehierRU10 maps
    ADR
    86.5
    KAST
    82%
    K/D
    1.18
  • fadeRU10 maps
    ADR
    85.1
    KAST
    78%
    K/D
    1.13
  • kemiRU10 maps
    ADR
    81.6
    KAST
    82%
    K/D
    1.28
  • L4FRU10 maps
    ADR
    71.9
    KAST
    77%
    K/D
    1.06
  • ElectroRU5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —

Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 19 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.

Head to head

Quintessence head-to-head record

Every meeting in the last three years against one regular opponent, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Quintessence's going into the match.

  • TitanFlow2–0

    2 meetings · opponent rated 27 lower on average

    Last:

Quintessence have beaten TitanFlow in all 2 of their meetings, most recently winning on 13 September.

Explore

Teams near Quintessence in the CS2 rankings

Closest in the rankings

Top teams in CIS

Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.

Pull this CS2 data yourself

Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.