Quintessence
Russia · CIS · ratings through 19 Oct 2026
Quintessence are ranked #49 of 363 CS2 teams, having entered the rankings this week, with a rating of 1,833, 110 points above BC.Game. They have won all of their last 7 matches, most recently 2–0 against Falcons Force in the CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8 playoffs on 19 October.
- CS2 rank
- #49
- of 363 teams
- new this week
- Rating
- 1,833
- range 1,617 to 2,049
- Last 7 matches
- 7–0
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 75%
- 12–4 on 16 maps
- last 6 months
Quintessence rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 19 Oct 2026
- No matches 13 Sep to 18 Oct
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct | 1,833 | 1,617 to 2,048 |
| 18 Oct | 1,809 | 1,581 to 2,036 |
| 13 Sep | 1,863 | 1,624 to 2,102 |
| 12 Sep | 1,796 | 1,529 to 2,064 |
| 10 Sep | 1,752 | 1,422 to 2,082 |
| 5 Sep | 1,600 | 1,144 to 2,055 |
Quintessence recent form
Each of the last 7 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Quintessence's before the match.
Last updated 19 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep | Sabertooth | Won 2–1 | — | — |
| 7 Sep | FLXRE | Won 2–0 | — | — |
| 10 Sep | gothboiclique | Won 2–1 | 1,600 v 1,753 | +153 |
| 12 Sep | TitanFlow | Won 2–1 | 1,752 v 1,748 | −4 |
| 13 Sep | TitanFlow | Won 2–0 | 1,796 v 1,745 | −51 |
| 18 Oct | benched gods | Won 2–1 | 1,863 v 1,450 | −413 |
| 19 Oct | Falcons Force | Won 2–0 | 1,809 v 1,544 | −265 |
Quintessence recent results
The latest seven matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 2–0
CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8
Playoffs
- Cache 13–9
- Inferno 13–10
Ratings going in: 1,809 v 1,544
- 2–1
CCT Europe 2026 Challengers 8
Playoffs
- Cache 10–13
- Dust2 13–10
- Inferno 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,863 v 1,450
- 2–0
CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–9
- Mirage 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,796 v 1,745
- 2–1
CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9
Playoffs
- Cache 12–16
- Mirage 13–10
- Inferno 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,752 v 1,748
- 2–1
CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9
Playoffs
- Cache 13–10
- Dust2 13–16
- Mirage 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,600 v 1,753
- 2–0FLXRE
CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9
Playoffs
—Ratings going in: 1,600 v —
- 2–1Sabertooth
CCT Europe 2026 Contenders 9
Playoffs
- Cache 9–13
- Dust2 13–3
- Mirage 13–8
Ratings going in: —
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Quintessence first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.
Quintessence CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cache | 52–3 · 40% | 62.2%▲ +9.7 · 37 rounds · low sample | 33.3%▼ −14.2 · 36 rounds · low sample | 2of 3 | 0of 3 |
| Dust2 | 43–1 · 75% | 71.4%▲ +20.3 · 21 rounds · low sample | 45.8%▼ −3.0 · 24 rounds · low sample | 1of 3 | 0of 3 |
| Mirage | 44–0 · 100% | 54.2%▼ −0.5 · 24 rounds · low sample | 72.2%▲ +26.9 · 18 rounds · low sample | 0of 3 | 0of 3 |
| Inferno | 33–0 · 100% | 52.8%▲ +1.2 · 36 rounds · low sample | 80.0%▲ +31.6 · 25 rounds · low sample | 0of 3 | 0of 3 |
| Ancient | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 3 | 2of 3 |
| Anubis | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 3 | 3of 3 |
| Nuke | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 3 | 1of 3 |
- Cache5 played · 2–3 · 40%CT rounds62.2%▲ +9.7 · 37 rounds · low sampleT rounds33.3%▼ −14.2 · 36 rounds · low sample
Picked 2 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3
- Dust24 played · 3–1 · 75%CT rounds71.4%▲ +20.3 · 21 rounds · low sampleT rounds45.8%▼ −3.0 · 24 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3
- Mirage4 played · 4–0 · 100%CT rounds54.2%▼ −0.5 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds72.2%▲ +26.9 · 18 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3
- Inferno3 played · 3–0 · 100%CT rounds52.8%▲ +1.2 · 36 rounds · low sampleT rounds80.0%▲ +31.6 · 25 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 0 of 3
- Ancient0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 2 of 3
- Anubis0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 3 of 3
- Nuke0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 3 · Banned 1 of 3
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
Quintessence playstyle
Six round-level rates from 221 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Quintessence; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 59.3% | 2nd of 31 | 55.8% |
| T round win rate | 54.4% | 3rd of 31 | 49.0% |
| Pistol rounds won | 55.0% | 9th of 31 | 52.7% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 78.6% | 2nd of 31 | 73.9% |
| Opening duels won | 53.2% | 5th of 31 | 51.3% |
| Clutches won | 22.3% | 1st of 31 | 12.7% |
Quintessence roster
The players in Quintessence's most recent match, on 19 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- dehierRU10 maps
- ADR
- 86.5
- KAST
- 82%
- K/D
- 1.18
- fadeRU10 maps
- ADR
- 85.1
- KAST
- 78%
- K/D
- 1.13
- kemiRU10 maps
- ADR
- 81.6
- KAST
- 82%
- K/D
- 1.28
- L4FRU10 maps
- ADR
- 71.9
- KAST
- 77%
- K/D
- 1.06
- ElectroRU5 maps
- ADR
- —
- KAST
- —
- K/D
- —
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 19 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
Quintessence head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against one regular opponent, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Quintessence's going into the match.
- TitanFlow2–0
2 meetings · opponent rated 27 lower on average
Last:
Quintessence have beaten TitanFlow in all 2 of their meetings, most recently winning on 13 September.
Teams near Quintessence in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #46Eternal Fire
- #47Wildcard
- #48BC.Game
- #50Sangal
- #51FOKUS
- #52Black Phoenix
Top teams in CIS
- #2Spirit
- #6Aurora
- #9Nemiga
- #11BetBoom
- #14PARIVISION
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.