EsportsOdds
Team · Counter-Strike 2

PEAK

Brazil · South America · ratings through 17 Sep 2026

PEAK are ranked #330 of 348 CS2 teams, down 11 places this week, with a rating of 1,184, 49 points below bLight blue. They have won 3 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to QUINTESSÊNCIA in the CCT South America 2026 Challengers 3 playoffs on 17 September.

CS2 rank
#330
of 348 teams
▼ 11 places this week
Rating
1,184
range 1,009 to 1,359
Last 14 matches
3–11
last 5
Map win rate
28%
8–21 on 29 maps
last 6 months
Rating

PEAK rating history

Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.

Last updated 17 Sep 2026

  • Peak
  • Low
PEAK's rating peaked at 1,747 on 27 June, fell to 1,183 on 14 September and has recovered to 1,184.
as of 17 Sep 2026 · 14 ratingsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
14 rating points, 27 June to 17 September
DateRatingRange
17 Sep1,1841,014 to 1,354
15 Sep1,1901,018 to 1,361
14 Sep1,1831,011 to 1,355
26 Aug1,2031,024 to 1,381
25 Aug1,2171,033 to 1,401
22 Aug1,2261,039 to 1,414
22 Aug1,2651,066 to 1,464
11 Aug1,2221,013 to 1,432
8 Aug1,2601,034 to 1,486
25 Jul1,3371,085 to 1,589
13 Jul1,3411,066 to 1,615
12 Jul1,4781,147 to 1,809
28 Jun1,5721,194 to 1,951
27 Jun1,7471,241 to 2,254
Form

PEAK recent form

Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above PEAK's before the match.

Last updated 17 Sep 2026

  • Win
  • Loss
PEAK have won 3 of their last 14 matches and were rated above the opponent in 6 of the 12 with both ratings. Six of their 11 losses came against teams rated above them.
as of 17 Sep 2026 · 14 matchesesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
Rating gap is the opponent’s rating minus the team’s, both just before the match
DateOpponentResultRatings going inRating gap
12 JulGUARAWon 1–01,478 v 1,252−226
12 JulRed FeetLost 1–21,478 v 1,264−214
14 JulCLTs e-SportsWon 1–0——
14 JulTeamSpeakUsersLost 0–11,341 v 1,329−12
25 JulUnderworldLost 1–2——
8 AugMETANOIA WolvesLost 0–21,337 v 1,312−25
11 AugRUSHLost 0–21,260 v 1,405+145
22 AugMetanoia in PyjamasLost 0–11,222 v 1,190−32
22 AugBTH E-SportsLost 0–21,265 v 1,339+74
25 AugFluxoLost 0–21,226 v 1,614+388
26 AugYawaraLost 0–21,217 v 1,513+296
13 SepMEIA NOITELost 0–21,203 v 1,412+209
15 SepTropa do felipudoWon 2–01,183 v 670−513
17 SepQUINTESSÊNCIALost 0–21,190 v 1,519+329
Results

PEAK recent results

The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.

  • 0–2
    QUINTESSÊNCIA

    CCT South America 2026 Challengers 3

    Playoffs

    • Ancient 10–13

    Ratings going in: 1,190 v 1,519

  • 2–0
    Tropa do felipudo

    CCT South America 2026 Challengers 3

    Playoffs

    • Ancient 13–2
    • Inferno 13–5

    Ratings going in: 1,183 v 670

  • 0–2
    MEIA NOITE

    CCT South America 2026 Challengers 3

    Playoffs

    • Ancient 9–13
    • Nuke 5–13

    Ratings going in: 1,203 v 1,412

  • 0–2
    Yawara

    ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 1

    Playoffs

    • Ancient 6–13
    • Dust2 5–13

    Ratings going in: 1,217 v 1,513

  • 0–2
    Fluxo

    ESL Challenger League Season 52: South America - Cup 1

    Playoffs

    • Inferno 10–13
    • Nuke 2–13

    Ratings going in: 1,226 v 1,614

  • 0–2
    BTH E-Sports

    Liga Gamers Club - Série B: Agosto/26

    • Anubis 4–13
    • Nuke 10–13

    Ratings going in: 1,265 v 1,339

  • 0–1
    Metanoia in Pyjamas

    Liga Gamers Club - Série B: Agosto/26

    • Mirage 16–14
    • Ancient 13–8

    Ratings going in: 1,222 v 1,190

  • 0–2
    RUSH

    CCT South America 2026 Challengers 2

    Playoffs

    • Inferno 2–13
    • Dust2 6–13

    Ratings going in: 1,260 v 1,405

Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are PEAK first.

Maps

PEAK CS2 map pool

The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.

  • Ancient9 played · 3–6 · 33%
    CT rounds
    14.3%▼ −38.4 · 7 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    41.7%▼ −5.7 · 12 rounds · low sample

    Picked 1 of 2 · Banned 0 of 2

  • Dust27 played · 2–5 · 29%
    CT rounds
    33.3%▼ −17.8 · 12 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    16.7%▼ −32.2 · 6 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 2 · Banned 1 of 2

  • Nuke5 played · 1–4 · 20%
    CT rounds
    16.7%▼ −39.0 · 12 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    0.0%▼ −44.4 · 3 rounds · low sample

    Picked 0 of 2 · Banned 0 of 2

  • Inferno4 played · 1–3 · 25%
    CT rounds
    54.5%▲ +2.9 · 11 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    33.3%▼ −15.1 · 12 rounds · low sample

    Picked 1 of 2 · Banned 0 of 2

  • Mirage3 played · 1–2 · 33%
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 2 · Banned 0 of 2

  • Anubis1 played · 0–1 · 0%
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 2 · Banned 1 of 2

  • Cache0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked 0 of 2 · Banned 2 of 2

  • ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
  • ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
  • fewer than 50 rounds
Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map PEAK chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. Vetoes are recorded for 2 of their 19 matches.
29 mapsesportsodds.gg
Playstyle

PEAK playstyle

Six round-level rates from 75 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is PEAK; the dashed line is the median.

CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side
31.0% · 31st of 31 · median 55.6%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side
30.3% · 31st of 31 · median 49.3%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half
62.5% · 1st of 31 · median 52.9%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill
51.7% · 31st of 31 · median 73.3%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round
38.7% · 31st of 31 · median 51.7%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
6.4% · 31st of 31 · median 12.7%
PEAK rank first of 31 on pistol rounds.
75 roundsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
PEAK round-level rates over the last six months
RateValueRank among top-ranked teamsMedian
CT round win rate31.0%31st of 3155.6%
T round win rate30.3%31st of 3149.3%
Pistol rounds won62.5%1st of 3152.9%
Rounds won after the first kill51.7%31st of 3173.3%
Opening duels won38.7%31st of 3151.7%
Clutches won6.4%31st of 3112.7%
Roster

PEAK roster

The players in PEAK's most recent match, on 26 Aug 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.

  • StraaferBR15 maps
    ADR
    64.3
    KAST
    67%
    K/D
    0.76
  • rwBR11 maps
    ADR
    55.6
    KAST
    68%
    K/D
    0.62
  • KLRBR7 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • veronezeBR4 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • dudinhoBR2 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —

Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 26 Aug 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.

Head to head

PEAK head-to-head record

Every meeting in the last three years against two regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus PEAK's going into the match.

  • RUSH0–2

    2 meetings · opponent rated 76 higher on average

    Last:

  • METANOIA Wolves0–2

    2 meetings · opponent rated 137 lower on average

    Last:

PEAK have not beaten RUSH in 2 meetings, most recently losing on 11 August.

Explore

Teams near PEAK in the CS2 rankings

Closest in the rankings

Top teams in South America

Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.

Pull this CS2 data yourself

Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.

Start freeSee the CS2 API