Team · Counter-Strike 2

Flame Hard CS2 stats

Portugal · Europe · ratings through 1 Oct 2026

Flame Hard are ranked #362 of 364 CS2 teams, down 11 places this week, with a rating of 1,112, 9 points below Icarus Gaming. They have won 1 of their last 10 matches, most recently losing 0–1 to SAW in the FOX Legacy Cup 1 group B on 1 October.

CS2 rank: #362; of 364 teams; ▼ 11 places this week
Rating: 1,112; range 785 to 1,438
Last 10 matches: 1–9; last 5
Map win rate: 0%; 0–5 on 5 maps; last 6 months

Rating

Flame Hard rating history

Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.

Last updated 1 Oct 2026

Peak 1,334 · 1 Oct1,112

Peak

Flame Hard's rating peaked at 1,334 on 1 October and has fallen to 1,112, its lowest in the last six months.

as of 1 Oct 2026 · 5 ratingsesportsodds.gg

View this chart as a table

5 rating points, 1 October to 1 October
Date	Rating	Range
1 Oct	1,112	787 to 1,436
1 Oct	1,117	788 to 1,445
1 Oct	1,173	807 to 1,538
1 Oct	1,265	842 to 1,689
1 Oct	1,334	837 to 1,830

Form

Flame Hard recent form

Each of the last 10 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Flame Hard's before the match.

Last updated 1 Oct 2026

equal ratings

Win
Loss

Flame Hard have won 1 of their last 10 matches and were rated below the opponent in 3 of the 4 with both ratings. Three of their nine losses came against teams rated above them.

as of 1 Oct 2026 · 10 matchesesportsodds.gg

View this chart as a table

Rating gap is the opponent’s rating minus the team’s, both just before the match
Date	Opponent	Result	Ratings going in	Rating gap
10 Sep	SAW	Lost 0–1	—	—
10 Sep	6666	Lost 0–1	—	—
10 Sep	NT	Lost 0–1	—	—
10 Sep	Giant Pandas	Won 1–0	—	—
10 Sep	STATE	Lost 0–1	—	—
1 Oct	Lazer Cats	Lost 0–1	—	—
1 Oct	NT	Lost 0–1	1,334 v 1,509	+175
1 Oct	SINQU	Lost 0–1	1,265 v 1,265	0
1 Oct	Famalicão	Lost 0–1	1,173 v 1,266	+93
1 Oct	SAW	Lost 0–1	1,117 v 1,703	+586

Results

Flame Hard recent results

The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.

Flame Hard recent results: date, event, opponent, result, map scores and both teams' ratings going in
Date	Event	Opponent	Result	Maps	Ratings
1 Oct	FOX Legacy Cup 1 Group B	SAW	0–1	Inferno 1–13	1,117 v 1,703
1 Oct	FOX Legacy Cup 1 Group B	Famalicão	0–1	Inferno 7–13	1,173 v 1,266
1 Oct	FOX Legacy Cup 1 Group B	SINQU	0–1	Nuke 23–25	1,265 v 1,265
1 Oct	FOX Legacy Cup 1 Group B	NT	0–1	Dust2 1–13	1,334 v 1,509
1 Oct	FOX Legacy Cup 1 Group B	Lazer Cats	0–1	Ancient 2–13	— v 1,518
10 Sep	Roman Imperium Cup VIII Group B	STATE	0–1	—	— v 1,468
10 Sep	Roman Imperium Cup VIII Group B	Giant Pandas	1–0	—	— v 1,384
10 Sep	Roman Imperium Cup VIII Group B	NT	0–1	—	— v 1,462

1 Oct
0–1
SAW
FOX Legacy Cup 1
Group B
- Inferno 1–13
Ratings going in: 1,117 v 1,703
1 Oct
0–1
Famalicão
FOX Legacy Cup 1
Group B
- Inferno 7–13
Ratings going in: 1,173 v 1,266
1 Oct
0–1
SINQU
FOX Legacy Cup 1
Group B
- Nuke 23–25
Ratings going in: 1,265 v 1,265
1 Oct
0–1
NT
FOX Legacy Cup 1
Group B
- Dust2 1–13
Ratings going in: 1,334 v 1,509
1 Oct
0–1
Lazer Cats
FOX Legacy Cup 1
Group B
- Ancient 2–13
Ratings going in: — v 1,518
10 Sep
0–1
STATE
Roman Imperium Cup VIII
Group B
—
Ratings going in: — v 1,468
10 Sep
1–0
Giant Pandas
Roman Imperium Cup VIII
Group B
—
Ratings going in: — v 1,384
10 Sep
0–1
NT
Roman Imperium Cup VIII
Group B
—
Ratings going in: — v 1,462

Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Flame Hard first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.

Maps

Flame Hard CS2 map pool

The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.

Flame Hard CS2 map pool over the last 6 months: maps played, round win rate on each side against other teams, and the maps picked and banned
Map	Played	CT rounds won, against other teams	T rounds won, against other teams	Picked	Banned
Inferno	20–2 · 0%	10.0%▼ −41.6 · 20 rounds · low sample	42.9%▼ −5.6 · 14 rounds · low sample	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Ancient	10–1 · 0%	16.7%▼ −36.0 · 12 rounds · low sample	0.0%▼ −47.4 · 3 rounds · low sample	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Dust2	10–1 · 0%	0.0%▼ −51.1 · 2 rounds · low sample	8.3%▼ −40.6 · 12 rounds · low sample	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Nuke	10–1 · 0%	58.3%▲ +2.5 · 24 rounds · low sample	37.5%▼ −6.7 · 24 rounds · low sample	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Anubis	0—	No rounds recorded	No rounds recorded	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Cache	0—	No rounds recorded	No rounds recorded	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded
Mirage	0—	No rounds recorded	No rounds recorded	—no vetoes recorded	—no vetoes recorded

Inferno2 played · 0–2 · 0%
CT rounds
10.0%▼ −41.6 · 20 rounds · low sample
T rounds
42.9%▼ −5.6 · 14 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Ancient1 played · 0–1 · 0%
CT rounds
16.7%▼ −36.0 · 12 rounds · low sample
T rounds
0.0%▼ −47.4 · 3 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Dust21 played · 0–1 · 0%
CT rounds
0.0%▼ −51.1 · 2 rounds · low sample
T rounds
8.3%▼ −40.6 · 12 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Nuke1 played · 0–1 · 0%
CT rounds
58.3%▲ +2.5 · 24 rounds · low sample
T rounds
37.5%▼ −6.7 · 24 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Anubis0 played
CT rounds
No rounds recorded
T rounds
No rounds recorded
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Cache0 played
CT rounds
No rounds recorded
T rounds
No rounds recorded
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
Mirage0 played
CT rounds
No rounds recorded
T rounds
No rounds recorded
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

▲ above other teams: darker is further above
▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
fewer than 50 rounds

Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map Flame Hard chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. No vetoes are recorded for their 10 matches.

5 mapsesportsodds.gg

Playstyle

Flame Hard playstyle

Six round-level rates from 111 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Flame Hard; the dashed line is the median.

CT round win rate

Rounds won on the CT side

31.0% · 31st of 31 · median 55.5%

T round win rate

Rounds won on the T side

30.2% · 31st of 31 · median 48.5%

Pistol rounds won

First round of each half

30.0% · 31st of 31 · median 52.7%

Rounds won after the first kill

When they get the opening kill

56.8% · 31st of 31 · median 73.6%

Opening duels won

Share of first kills in a round

40.0% · 31st of 31 · median 51.3%

Clutches won

Of clutch situations faced

5.1% · 31st of 31 · median 12.6%

Flame Hard's highest placing among 31 top-ranked teams is 31st, on CT rounds.

111 roundsesportsodds.gg

View this chart as a table

Flame Hard round-level rates over the last six months
Rate	Value	Rank among top-ranked teams	Median
CT round win rate	31.0%	31st of 31	55.5%
T round win rate	30.2%	31st of 31	48.5%
Pistol rounds won	30.0%	31st of 31	52.7%
Rounds won after the first kill	56.8%	31st of 31	73.6%
Opening duels won	40.0%	31st of 31	51.3%
Clutches won	5.1%	31st of 31	12.6%

Roster

Flame Hard roster

The players in Flame Hard's most recent match, on 1 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.

Flame Hard roster: nickname and country, with maps, ADR, KAST and K/D over the last 12 months
Player	Last 12 months
Player	Maps	ADR	KAST	K/D
maddeNUS	27	73.7	67%	0.81
ManéPT	23	62.3	71%	0.73
5 StarPT	14	74.7	69%	0.85
stAxPT	5	—	—	—
TomZhyPT	5	—	—	—

maddeNUS27 maps
ADR
73.7
KAST
67%
K/D
0.81
ManéPT23 maps
ADR
62.3
KAST
71%
K/D
0.73
5 StarPT14 maps
ADR
74.7
KAST
69%
K/D
0.85
stAxPT5 maps
ADR
—
KAST
—
K/D
—
TomZhyPT5 maps
ADR
—
KAST
—
K/D
—

Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 1 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.

Head to head

Flame Hard head-to-head record

Every meeting in the last three years against two regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Flame Hard's going into the match.

Flame Hard record against the opponents it has met most: record, meeting-by-meeting results and the last meeting
Opponent	Record	Meetings	Last meeting
SAW	0–2	2 meetings · opponent rated 586 higher on average, over 1 rated meeting	1 Oct 2026 · lost
NT	0–2	2 meetings · opponent rated 175 higher on average, over 1 rated meeting	1 Oct 2026 · lost

SAW0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 586 higher on average, over 1 rated meeting
Last: 1 Oct 2026 · lost
NT0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 175 higher on average, over 1 rated meeting
Last: 1 Oct 2026 · lost

Flame Hard have not beaten SAW in 2 meetings, most recently losing on 1 October.

Explore

Teams near Flame Hard in the CS2 rankings

Closest in the rankings

Top teams in Europe

Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.

Learn

How to read Flame Hard's CS2 stats

Pull this CS2 data yourself

Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.

Start free See the CS2 API