XEPT CS2 stats
XEPT are ranked #361 of 371 CS2 teams, up two places this week, with a rating of 1,254, 3 points below Glitchtech. They have lost all of their last 5 matches, most recently 0–1 to SportsBetExpert in the Journey Autumn 2026 group B on 2 October.
Ratings through 2 Oct 2026
- CS2 rankof 371 teams, up 2 places this week
- #361
- Ratingrange 880 to 1,627
- 1,254
- Last 5 matcheswon and lost since 2 Oct
- 0–5
- Map win rate0–5 on 5 maps, last 6 months
- 0%
XEPT rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
XEPT's rating peaked at 1,420 on 2 October and has fallen to 1,254, its lowest in the last six months.
Last updated 2 Oct 2026
- Peak
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct | 1,254 | 883 to 1,624 |
| 2 Oct | 1,276 | 883 to 1,668 |
| 2 Oct | 1,295 | 882 to 1,708 |
| 2 Oct | 1,322 | 878 to 1,766 |
| 2 Oct | 1,420 | 865 to 1,975 |
XEPT recent form
The last 5 matches, oldest on the left. A filled square is a win and an outlined square is a loss.
Last updated 2 Oct 2026
- 2 Oct: lost 0–1 against Ninjas in Pyjamas
- 2 Oct: lost 0–1 against HAVU
- 2 Oct: lost 0–1 against BBL
- 2 Oct: lost 0–1 against Sangal
- 2 Oct: lost 0–1 against SportsBetExpert
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct | Ninjas in Pyjamas | Lost 0–1 | – | – |
| 2 Oct | HAVU | Lost 0–1 | 1,420 v 1,529 | +109 |
| 2 Oct | BBL | Lost 0–1 | 1,322 v 1,687 | +365 |
| 2 Oct | Sangal | Lost 0–1 | 1,295 v 1,709 | +414 |
| 2 Oct | SportsBetExpert | Lost 0–1 | 1,276 v 1,638 | +362 |
XEPT recent results
The latest five matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
| Opponent | Date | Event | Result | Maps, XEPT first | Ratings going in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SportsBetExpert | Journey Autumn 2026Group B | Lost0–1 |
| 1,276 v 1,638 | |
| Sangal | Journey Autumn 2026Group B | Lost0–1 |
| 1,295 v 1,709 | |
| BBL | Journey Autumn 2026Group B | Lost0–1 |
| 1,322 v 1,687 | |
| HAVU | Journey Autumn 2026Group B | Lost0–1 |
| 1,420 v 1,529 | |
| Ninjas in Pyjamas | Journey Autumn 2026Group B | Lost0–1 |
| – v 1,763 |
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are XEPT first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.
XEPT CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | Won | CT rounds won | T rounds won | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 3 | 0%0–3 | 30.6%CT gap to other teams −24.036 rounds, low sample | 12.5%T gap to other teams −33.016 rounds, low sample | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Ancient | 1 | 0%0–1 | 0.0%CT gap to other teams −52.93 rounds, low sample | 16.7%T gap to other teams −30.512 rounds, low sample | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Inferno | 1 | 0%0–1 | 0.0%CT gap to other teams −51.43 rounds, low sample | 16.7%T gap to other teams −32.012 rounds, low sample | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Anubis | 0 | – | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Cache | 0 | – | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Dust2 | 0 | – | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
| Nuke | 0 | – | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | –no vetoes recorded | –no vetoes recorded |
One map wonOne map lostRound rates show the gap to other teams on that map and side, in pointsPicks and bans from 0 recorded vetoes
Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map XEPT chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. No vetoes are recorded for their 5 matches.
XEPT playstyle
Six round-level rates from 82 recorded rounds in the last six months. Each square is one top-ranked team, best on the left; the large square is XEPT.
- 26.2%31st of 31, median 55.8%
CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side - 15.0%31st of 31, median 48.8%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side - 25.0%31st of 31, median 51.2%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half - 36.7%31st of 31, median 73.7%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill - 36.6%31st of 31, median 51.2%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round - 7.7%31st of 31, median 12.4%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
XEPT's highest placing among 31 top-ranked teams is 31st, on CT rounds.
XEPT roster
| Player | Maps | ADR | KAST | K/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| caravaggioSE | 5 | – | – | – |
| GibsandSE | 5 | – | – | – |
| T1mpaSE | 5 | – | – | – |
| Valtr1xSE | 5 | – | – | – |
| zernSE | 5 | – | – | – |
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 2 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
XEPT head-to-head record
XEPT have no repeat opponents to show for this period.
Teams near XEPT in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #358New Legends
- #359GoldRashers
- #360Glitchtech
- #362Orion Wanderers
- #363menszczysni
- #364LFO 7
Top teams in Europe
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read XEPT's CS2 stats
This map pool is one API call
XEPT's record on each map, from the team maps endpoint of the CS2 API.
The team maps endpoint needs a paid plan, from $99 a month. A free sandbox key reads a fixed sample of past matches, to try the API first.
$ curl -G -H "Authorization: Bearer $ESPORTSODDS_API_KEY" \ -d window=6m -d era=cs2 -d active=true \ https://api.esportsodds.gg/v1/cs2/teams/xept/maps { "data": [ {"map_name": "de_mirage", "played": 3, "wins": 0}, {"map_name": "de_ancient", "played": 1, "wins": 0}, {"map_name": "de_inferno", "played": 1, "wins": 0} ], "meta": { "count": 3, "next_cursor": null } }