EsportsOdds
Team · Counter-Strike 2

XEPT

Sweden · Europe · ratings through 2 Oct 2026

XEPT are ranked #337 of 345 CS2 teams, down two places this week, with a rating of 1,254, 94 points above Zetta. They have lost all of their last 5 matches, most recently 0–1 to SportsBetExpert in the Journey Autumn 2026 group B on 2 October.

CS2 rank
#337
of 345 teams
▼ 2 places this week
Rating
1,254
range 882 to 1,625
Last 5 matches
0–5
last 5
Map win rate
0%
0–5 on 5 maps
last 6 months
Rating

XEPT rating history

Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.

Last updated 2 Oct 2026

  • Peak
XEPT's rating peaked at 1,420 on 2 October and has fallen to 1,254, its lowest in the last six months.
as of 2 Oct 2026 · 5 ratingsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
5 rating points, 2 October to 2 October
DateRatingRange
2 Oct1,254883 to 1,624
2 Oct1,276883 to 1,668
2 Oct1,295882 to 1,708
2 Oct1,322878 to 1,766
2 Oct1,420865 to 1,975
Form

XEPT recent form

Each of the last 5 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above XEPT's before the match.

Last updated 2 Oct 2026

  • Win
  • Loss
XEPT have lost all of their last 5 matches and were rated below the opponent in 4 of the 4 with both ratings.
as of 2 Oct 2026 · 5 matchesesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
Rating gap is the opponent’s rating minus the team’s, both just before the match
DateOpponentResultRatings going inRating gap
2 OctNinjas in PyjamasLost 0–1——
2 OctHAVULost 0–11,420 v 1,529+109
2 OctBBLLost 0–11,322 v 1,687+365
2 OctSangalLost 0–11,295 v 1,709+414
2 OctSportsBetExpertLost 0–11,276 v 1,638+362
Results

XEPT recent results

The latest five matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.

  • 0–1
    SportsBetExpert

    Journey Autumn 2026

    Group B

    • Mirage 2–13

    Ratings going in: 1,276 v 1,638

  • 0–1
    Sangal

    Journey Autumn 2026

    Group B

    • Mirage 7–13

    Ratings going in: 1,295 v 1,709

  • 0–1
    BBL

    Journey Autumn 2026

    Group B

    • Ancient 2–13

    Ratings going in: 1,322 v 1,687

  • 0–1
    HAVU

    Journey Autumn 2026

    Group B

    • Mirage 4–13

    Ratings going in: 1,420 v 1,529

  • 0–1
    Ninjas in Pyjamas

    Journey Autumn 2026

    Group B

    • Inferno 2–13

    Ratings going in: — v 1,763

Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are XEPT first. A dash means that team had no earlier rated match.

Maps

XEPT CS2 map pool

The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.

  • Mirage3 played · 0–3 · 0%
    CT rounds
    30.6%▼ −24.1 · 36 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    12.5%▼ −32.9 · 16 rounds · low sample

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Ancient1 played · 0–1 · 0%
    CT rounds
    0.0%▼ −52.6 · 3 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    16.7%▼ −30.7 · 12 rounds · low sample

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Inferno1 played · 0–1 · 0%
    CT rounds
    0.0%▼ −51.6 · 3 rounds · low sample
    T rounds
    16.7%▼ −31.7 · 12 rounds · low sample

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Anubis0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Cache0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Dust20 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • Nuke0 played
    CT rounds
    No rounds recorded
    T rounds
    No rounds recorded

    Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded

  • ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
  • ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
  • fewer than 50 rounds
Retired maps are not shown. A pick is a map XEPT chose; the deciding map is neither picked nor banned. No vetoes are recorded for their 5 matches.
5 mapsesportsodds.gg
Playstyle

XEPT playstyle

Six round-level rates from 82 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is XEPT; the dashed line is the median.

CT round win rate
Rounds won on the CT side
26.2% · 31st of 31 · median 55.6%
T round win rate
Rounds won on the T side
15.0% · 31st of 31 · median 49.0%
Pistol rounds won
First round of each half
25.0% · 31st of 31 · median 52.8%
Rounds won after the first kill
When they get the opening kill
36.7% · 31st of 31 · median 73.4%
Opening duels won
Share of first kills in a round
36.6% · 31st of 31 · median 51.7%
Clutches won
Of clutch situations faced
7.7% · 31st of 31 · median 13.0%
XEPT's highest placing among 31 top-ranked teams is 31st, on CT rounds.
82 roundsesportsodds.gg
View this chart as a table
XEPT round-level rates over the last six months
RateValueRank among top-ranked teamsMedian
CT round win rate26.2%31st of 3155.6%
T round win rate15.0%31st of 3149.0%
Pistol rounds won25.0%31st of 3152.8%
Rounds won after the first kill36.7%31st of 3173.4%
Opening duels won36.6%31st of 3151.7%
Clutches won7.7%31st of 3113.0%
Roster

XEPT roster

The players in XEPT's most recent match, on 2 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.

  • caravaggioSE5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • GibsandSE5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • T1mpaSE5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • Valtr1xSE5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —
  • zernSE5 maps
    ADR
    —
    KAST
    —
    K/D
    —

Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 2 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.

Head to head

XEPT head-to-head record

XEPT have no repeat opponents to show for this period.

Explore

Teams near XEPT in the CS2 rankings

Closest in the rankings

Top teams in Europe

Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.

Pull this CS2 data yourself

Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.

Start freeSee the CS2 API