Villainous
United States · North America · ratings through 10 Oct 2026
Villainous are ranked #287 of 348 CS2 teams, down 13 places this week, with a rating of 1,272, 128 points below Pugdesonesto. They have won 5 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to regain in the ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 3 playoffs on 10 October.
- CS2 rank
- #287
- of 348 teams
- ▼ 13 places this week
- Rating
- 1,272
- range 1,157 to 1,386
- World rank #221
- Last 14 matches
- 5–9
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 43%
- 20–26 on 46 maps
- last 6 months
Villainous rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 10 Oct 2026
- No matches 12 Jul to 26 Aug
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct | 1,272 | 1,159 to 1,385 |
| 9 Oct | 1,285 | 1,171 to 1,399 |
| 8 Oct | 1,286 | 1,170 to 1,403 |
| 26 Sep | 1,291 | 1,172 to 1,410 |
| 25 Sep | 1,302 | 1,179 to 1,426 |
| 24 Sep | 1,283 | 1,158 to 1,408 |
| 23 Sep | 1,281 | 1,152 to 1,410 |
| 10 Sep | 1,264 | 1,133 to 1,395 |
| 9 Sep | 1,273 | 1,141 to 1,405 |
| 7 Sep | 1,278 | 1,146 to 1,410 |
| 7 Sep | 1,244 | 1,112 to 1,376 |
| 6 Sep | 1,214 | 1,080 to 1,347 |
| 5 Sep | 1,217 | 1,078 to 1,356 |
| 5 Sep | 1,227 | 1,083 to 1,372 |
| 4 Sep | 1,236 | 1,090 to 1,382 |
| 28 Aug | 1,249 | 1,102 to 1,397 |
| 27 Aug | 1,271 | 1,119 to 1,423 |
| 26 Aug | 1,251 | 1,089 to 1,414 |
| 12 Jul | 1,271 | 1,096 to 1,445 |
| 12 Jul | 1,288 | 1,108 to 1,468 |
Villainous recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above Villainous' before the match.
Last updated 10 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep | Overtake Sector | Lost 0–1 | 1,236 v 1,387 | +151 |
| 5 Sep | Incognito | Lost 1–2 | 1,227 v 1,253 | +26 |
| 6 Sep | FarmVille | Lost 1–2 | 1,217 v 1,303 | +86 |
| 7 Sep | Axial | Won 2–0 | 1,214 v 1,384 | +170 |
| 7 Sep | Babag | Won 2–0 | 1,244 v 1,629 | +385 |
| 9 Sep | Voca | Lost 0–2 | 1,278 v 1,676 | +398 |
| 10 Sep | Without a Roof | Lost 0–2 | 1,273 v 1,540 | +267 |
| 23 Sep | New Legends | Won 2–0 | 1,264 v 1,163 | −101 |
| 24 Sep | Overtake Sector | Lost 1–2 | 1,281 v 1,433 | +152 |
| 25 Sep | NuTorious | Won 2–0 | 1,283 v 1,246 | −37 |
| 26 Sep | DETONATE | Lost 1–2 | 1,302 v 1,288 | −14 |
| 8 Oct | FarmVille | Lost 1–2 | 1,291 v 1,351 | +60 |
| 9 Oct | Reign Above | Won 2–1 | 1,286 v 1,144 | −142 |
| 10 Oct | regain | Lost 0–2 | 1,285 v 1,383 | +98 |
Villainous recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Anubis 10–13
- Inferno 7–13
Ratings going in: 1,285 v 1,383
- 2–1Reign Above
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Nuke 11–13
- Anubis 13–11
- Inferno 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,286 v 1,144
- 1–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Dust2 7–13
- Mirage 13–7
- Inferno 10–13
Ratings going in: 1,291 v 1,351
- 1–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Nuke 6–13
- Anubis 13–10
- Inferno 7–13
Ratings going in: 1,302 v 1,288
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–8
- Anubis 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,283 v 1,246
- 1–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Anubis 13–5
- Mirage 11–13
- Dust2 10–13
Ratings going in: 1,281 v 1,433
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–6
- Inferno 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,264 v 1,163
- 0–2
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: North American Qualifier
Playoffs
- Mirage 7–13
- Inferno 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,273 v 1,540
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are Villainous first.
Villainous CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 124–8 · 33% | 46.5%▼ −5.1 · 101 rounds | 41.1%▼ −7.3 · 73 rounds | 3of 14 | 0of 14 |
| Anubis | 118–3 · 73% | 61.3%▲ +12.2 · 62 rounds | 64.1%▲ +13.3 · 78 rounds | 7of 14 | 0of 14 |
| Mirage | 104–6 · 40% | 59.7%▲ +5.2 · 77 rounds | 42.0%▼ −3.5 · 81 rounds | 1of 14 | 2of 14 |
| Dust2 | 52–3 · 40% | 44.4%▼ −6.7 · 36 rounds · low sample | 53.8%▲ +5.0 · 26 rounds · low sample | 0of 14 | 6of 14 |
| Ancient | 30–3 · 0% | 27.3%▼ −25.4 · 22 rounds · low sample | 50.0%▲ +2.6 · 26 rounds · low sample | 1of 14 | 10of 14 |
| Nuke | 31–2 · 33% | 54.2%▼ −1.5 · 24 rounds · low sample | 21.1%▼ −23.3 · 19 rounds · low sample | 0of 14 | 4of 14 |
| Cache | 21–1 · 50% | 50.0%▼ −2.7 · 12 rounds · low sample | 22.2%▼ −25.1 · 9 rounds · low sample | 0of 14 | 8of 14 |
- Inferno12 played · 4–8 · 33%CT rounds46.5%▼ −5.1 · 101 roundsT rounds41.1%▼ −7.3 · 73 rounds
Picked 3 of 14 · Banned 0 of 14
- Anubis11 played · 8–3 · 73%CT rounds61.3%▲ +12.2 · 62 roundsT rounds64.1%▲ +13.3 · 78 rounds
Picked 7 of 14 · Banned 0 of 14
- Mirage10 played · 4–6 · 40%CT rounds59.7%▲ +5.2 · 77 roundsT rounds42.0%▼ −3.5 · 81 rounds
Picked 1 of 14 · Banned 2 of 14
- Dust25 played · 2–3 · 40%CT rounds44.4%▼ −6.7 · 36 rounds · low sampleT rounds53.8%▲ +5.0 · 26 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 14 · Banned 6 of 14
- Ancient3 played · 0–3 · 0%CT rounds27.3%▼ −25.4 · 22 rounds · low sampleT rounds50.0%▲ +2.6 · 26 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 14 · Banned 10 of 14
- Nuke3 played · 1–2 · 33%CT rounds54.2%▼ −1.5 · 24 rounds · low sampleT rounds21.1%▼ −23.3 · 19 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 14 · Banned 4 of 14
- Cache2 played · 1–1 · 50%CT rounds50.0%▼ −2.7 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds22.2%▼ −25.1 · 9 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 14 · Banned 8 of 14
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
Villainous playstyle
Six round-level rates from 646 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is Villainous; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 51.5% | 28th of 31 | 55.6% |
| T round win rate | 47.1% | 24th of 31 | 49.3% |
| Pistol rounds won | 43.5% | 31st of 31 | 52.8% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 74.3% | 12th of 31 | 73.5% |
| Opening duels won | 51.3% | 17th of 31 | 51.7% |
| Clutches won | 11.1% | 28th of 31 | 12.7% |
Villainous roster
The players in Villainous' most recent match, on 10 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- DYLANCA35 maps
- ADR
- 78.2
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 1.03
- sunkoUS35 maps
- ADR
- 77.3
- KAST
- 73%
- K/D
- 1.23
- BurglarCA34 maps
- ADR
- 83.3
- KAST
- 72%
- K/D
- 0.96
- JoltsUS33 maps
- ADR
- 70.7
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 0.88
- brightUS31 maps
- ADR
- 68.0
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 0.94
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 10 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
Villainous head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against three regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus Villainous' going into the match.
- FarmVille0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 73 higher on average
Last:
- DETONATE1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 5 higher on average
Last:
3 meetings · opponent rated 98 higher on average
Last:
Villainous have not beaten FarmVille in 2 meetings, most recently losing on 8 October.
Teams near Villainous in the CS2 rankings
Top teams in North America
- #20FaZe
- #21Liquid
- #22100 Thieves
- #32M80
- #35Luminosity
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.