PURE CS2 stats
Lithuania · Europe · ratings through 10 Oct 2026
PURE are ranked #124 of 368 CS2 teams, up three places this week, with a rating of 1,598, 22 points above PCIFIC. They have won 10 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 1–2 to Sangal in the Roman Imperium Cup IX playoffs on 10 October.
- CS2 rank
- #124
- of 368 teams
- ▲ 3 places this week
- Rating
- 1,598
- range 1,470 to 1,726
- World rank #174
- Last 14 matches
- 10–4
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 57%
- 29–22 on 51 maps
- last 6 months
PURE rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 10 Oct 2026
- No matches 13 Jun to 4 Jul
- No matches 30 Aug to 1 Oct
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct | 1,598 | 1,474 to 1,721 |
| 9 Oct | 1,598 | 1,471 to 1,725 |
| 9 Oct | 1,574 | 1,444 to 1,703 |
| 8 Oct | 1,585 | 1,453 to 1,716 |
| 7 Oct | 1,559 | 1,424 to 1,693 |
| 7 Oct | 1,546 | 1,411 to 1,682 |
| 7 Oct | 1,533 | 1,397 to 1,670 |
| 7 Oct | 1,529 | 1,393 to 1,665 |
| 7 Oct | 1,524 | 1,388 to 1,660 |
| 2 Oct | 1,506 | 1,369 to 1,643 |
| 1 Oct | 1,533 | 1,393 to 1,673 |
| 1 Oct | 1,520 | 1,378 to 1,661 |
| 1 Oct | 1,533 | 1,390 to 1,676 |
| 1 Oct | 1,515 | 1,370 to 1,659 |
| 1 Oct | 1,498 | 1,353 to 1,644 |
| 30 Aug | 1,481 | 1,334 to 1,628 |
| 29 Aug | 1,482 | 1,327 to 1,637 |
| 12 Aug | 1,469 | 1,312 to 1,627 |
| 11 Aug | 1,492 | 1,333 to 1,651 |
| 28 Jul | 1,515 | 1,356 to 1,675 |
| 28 Jul | 1,472 | 1,305 to 1,639 |
| 27 Jul | 1,465 | 1,289 to 1,640 |
| 27 Jul | 1,442 | 1,262 to 1,622 |
| 10 Jul | 1,413 | 1,229 to 1,597 |
| 9 Jul | 1,446 | 1,253 to 1,639 |
| 7 Jul | 1,469 | 1,259 to 1,679 |
| 4 Jul | 1,420 | 1,196 to 1,645 |
| 13 Jun | 1,407 | 1,150 to 1,664 |
| 13 Jun | 1,499 | 1,200 to 1,797 |
| 13 Jun | 1,387 | 1,033 to 1,740 |
PURE recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above PURE's before the match.
Last updated 10 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct | Next Up | Won 1–0 | 1,498 v 1,565 | +67 |
| 1 Oct | NAVI Junior | Won 1–0 | 1,515 v 1,607 | +92 |
| 1 Oct | aimclub | Lost 0–1 | 1,533 v 1,555 | +22 |
| 1 Oct | ABT | Won 1–0 | 1,520 v 1,521 | +1 |
| 2 Oct | NT | Lost 0–2 | 1,533 v 1,517 | −16 |
| 7 Oct | OG | Won 1–0 | 1,506 v 1,645 | +139 |
| 7 Oct | SINQU | Won 1–0 | 1,524 v 1,260 | −264 |
| 7 Oct | Orion Wanderers | Won 1–0 | 1,529 v 1,230 | −299 |
| 7 Oct | G2 Ares | Won 1–0 | 1,533 v 1,535 | +2 |
| 7 Oct | Falcons Force | Won 1–0 | 1,546 v 1,538 | −8 |
| 8 Oct | EAC | Won 2–0 | 1,559 v 1,582 | +23 |
| 9 Oct | FaZe | Lost 0–2 | 1,585 v 1,792 | +207 |
| 9 Oct | WBT | Won 2–0 | 1,574 v 1,601 | +27 |
| 10 Oct | Sangal | Lost 1–2 | 1,598 v 1,714 | +116 |
PURE recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 1–2
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Playoffs
- Ancient 13–2
- Nuke 3–13
- Cache 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,598 v 1,714
- 2–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Playoffs
- Ancient 13–9
- Anubis 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,574 v 1,601
- 0–2
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Playoffs
- Ancient 9–13
- Mirage 14–16
Ratings going in: 1,585 v 1,792
- 2–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Playoffs
- Inferno 13–8
- Anubis 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,559 v 1,582
- 1–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Group A
- Inferno 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,546 v 1,538
- 1–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Group A
- Ancient 13–3
Ratings going in: 1,533 v 1,535
- 1–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Group A
- Ancient 13–8
Ratings going in: 1,529 v 1,230
- 1–0
Roman Imperium Cup IX
Group A
- Nuke 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,524 v 1,260
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are PURE first.
PURE CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 115–6 · 45% | 58.3%▲ +4.0 · 96 rounds | 41.1%▼ −4.5 · 73 rounds | 4of 15 | 3of 15 |
| Nuke | 106–4 · 60% | 65.3%▲ +9.4 · 98 rounds | 41.5%▼ −2.5 · 94 rounds | 2of 15 | 0of 15 |
| Ancient | 95–4 · 56% | 46.7%▼ −6.2 · 75 rounds | 61.3%▲ +14.2 · 80 rounds | 3of 15 | 6of 15 |
| Inferno | 85–3 · 63% | 56.8%▲ +5.2 · 88 rounds | 59.7%▲ +11.3 · 67 rounds | 1of 15 | 1of 15 |
| Anubis | 53–2 · 60% | 55.6%▲ +6.3 · 27 rounds · low sample | 51.7%▲ +1.0 · 29 rounds · low sample | 0of 15 | 8of 15 |
| Cache | 42–2 · 50% | 50.0%▼ −2.4 · 42 rounds · low sample | 52.5%▲ +4.9 · 40 rounds · low sample | 1of 15 | 4of 15 |
| Dust2 | 43–1 · 75% | 58.3%▲ +7.2 · 36 rounds · low sample | 53.6%▲ +4.7 · 28 rounds · low sample | 1of 15 | 9of 15 |
- Mirage11 played · 5–6 · 45%CT rounds58.3%▲ +4.0 · 96 roundsT rounds41.1%▼ −4.5 · 73 rounds
Picked 4 of 15 · Banned 3 of 15
- Nuke10 played · 6–4 · 60%CT rounds65.3%▲ +9.4 · 98 roundsT rounds41.5%▼ −2.5 · 94 rounds
Picked 2 of 15 · Banned 0 of 15
- Ancient9 played · 5–4 · 56%CT rounds46.7%▼ −6.2 · 75 roundsT rounds61.3%▲ +14.2 · 80 rounds
Picked 3 of 15 · Banned 6 of 15
- Inferno8 played · 5–3 · 63%CT rounds56.8%▲ +5.2 · 88 roundsT rounds59.7%▲ +11.3 · 67 rounds
Picked 1 of 15 · Banned 1 of 15
- Anubis5 played · 3–2 · 60%CT rounds55.6%▲ +6.3 · 27 rounds · low sampleT rounds51.7%▲ +1.0 · 29 rounds · low sample
Picked 0 of 15 · Banned 8 of 15
- Cache4 played · 2–2 · 50%CT rounds50.0%▼ −2.4 · 42 rounds · low sampleT rounds52.5%▲ +4.9 · 40 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 15 · Banned 4 of 15
- Dust24 played · 3–1 · 75%CT rounds58.3%▲ +7.2 · 36 rounds · low sampleT rounds53.6%▲ +4.7 · 28 rounds · low sample
Picked 1 of 15 · Banned 9 of 15
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
PURE playstyle
Six round-level rates from 889 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is PURE; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 57.1% | 11th of 31 | 55.8% |
| T round win rate | 50.6% | 9th of 31 | 48.8% |
| Pistol rounds won | 65.9% | 1st of 31 | 52.5% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 74.2% | 13th of 31 | 73.8% |
| Opening duels won | 52.0% | 12th of 31 | 51.5% |
| Clutches won | 14.4% | 4th of 31 | 12.8% |
PURE roster
The players in PURE's most recent match, on 10 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- POLOPL114 maps
- ADR
- 72.0
- KAST
- 75%
- K/D
- 1.14
- aNduEE109 maps
- ADR
- 81.2
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 0.95
- PolbandanaUA88 maps
- ADR
- 74.6
- KAST
- 78%
- K/D
- 1.12
- teinPL67 maps
- ADR
- 71.9
- KAST
- 75%
- K/D
- 1.13
- keenLV53 maps
- ADR
- 78.9
- KAST
- 75%
- K/D
- 1.08
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 10 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
PURE head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against four regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus PURE's going into the match.
- Sangal0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 114 higher on average
Last:
2 meetings · opponent rated 25 higher on average
Last:
- aimclub0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 14 higher on average
Last:
- ASTRAL1–1
2 meetings · opponent rated 77 higher on average
Last:
PURE have not beaten Sangal in 2 meetings, most recently losing on 10 October.
Teams near PURE in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #121The Golden Horde
- #122BAKS
- #123PCIFIC
- #125Inner Circle Academy
- #126THUNDER dOWNUNDER
- #127Without a Roof
Top teams in Europe
- #1Vitality
- #2MOUZ
- #7FUT
- #8Natus Vincere
- #14HEROIC
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read PURE's CS2 stats
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.