LFO 8
Australia · Oceania · ratings through 12 Oct 2026
LFO 8 are ranked #312 of 345 CS2 teams, down three places this week, with a rating of 1,217, 96 points below ENRAGE. They have won 4 of their last 10 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to Rooster in the ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 3 playoffs on 12 October.
- CS2 rank
- #312
- of 345 teams
- ▼ 3 places this week
- Rating
- 1,217
- range 1,044 to 1,391
- World rank #279
- Last 10 matches
- 4–6
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 38%
- 8–13 on 21 maps
- last 6 months
LFO 8 rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 12 Oct 2026
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct | 1,217 | 1,045 to 1,390 |
| 10 Oct | 1,243 | 1,062 to 1,425 |
| 26 Sep | 1,305 | 1,115 to 1,496 |
| 25 Sep | 1,354 | 1,149 to 1,558 |
| 24 Sep | 1,332 | 1,097 to 1,568 |
| 23 Sep | 1,305 | 1,058 to 1,552 |
| 22 Sep | 1,322 | 1,064 to 1,580 |
| 9 Sep | 1,214 | 923 to 1,506 |
| 28 Aug | 1,074 | 736 to 1,412 |
| 26 Aug | 1,235 | 826 to 1,644 |
LFO 8 recent form
Each of the last 10 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above LFO 8's before the match.
Last updated 12 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug | Ground Zero | Lost 0–2 | — | — |
| 28 Aug | MARKandLARRY | Lost 0–2 | 1,235 v 1,160 | −75 |
| 9 Sep | Finishers | Won 2–0 | 1,074 v 1,185 | +111 |
| 22 Sep | MARKandLARRY | Won 2–0 | 1,214 v 1,300 | +86 |
| 23 Sep | FlyQuest | Lost 0–2 | 1,322 v 1,716 | +394 |
| 24 Sep | Fruju | Won 2–0 | 1,305 v 1,021 | −284 |
| 25 Sep | Mindfreak | Won 2–1 | 1,332 v 1,299 | −33 |
| 26 Sep | Rooster | Lost 0–2 | 1,354 v 1,374 | +20 |
| 10 Oct | MARKandLARRY | Lost 0–2 | 1,305 v 1,155 | −150 |
| 12 Oct | Rooster | Lost 0–2 | 1,243 v 1,386 | +143 |
LFO 8 recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Cache 8–13
- Anubis 7–13
Ratings going in: 1,243 v 1,386
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 3
Playoffs
- Nuke 11–13
- Cache 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,305 v 1,155
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Inferno 9–13
- Anubis 1–13
Ratings going in: 1,354 v 1,374
- 2–1
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Dust2 19–17
- Nuke 11–13
- Ancient 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,332 v 1,299
- 2–0Fruju
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–10
- Inferno 13–4
Ratings going in: 1,305 v 1,021
- 0–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Cache 3–13
- Dust2 4–13
Ratings going in: 1,322 v 1,716
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: Oceania - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Cache 13–9
- Dust2 13–3
Ratings going in: 1,214 v 1,300
- 2–0
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026: Oceanic Qualifier
Playoffs
- Inferno 16–14
- Cache 16–12
Ratings going in: 1,074 v 1,185
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are LFO 8 first.
LFO 8 CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cache | 52–3 · 40% | 28.1%▼ −24.6 · 32 rounds · low sample | 47.9%▲ +0.6 · 48 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Dust2 | 53–2 · 60% | 61.5%▲ +10.5 · 65 rounds | 27.9%▼ −21.0 · 43 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Inferno | 32–1 · 67% | 91.7%▲ +40.1 · 12 rounds · low sample | 40.0%▼ −8.4 · 5 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Nuke | 30–3 · 0% | 55.9%▲ +0.1 · 34 rounds · low sample | 33.3%▼ −10.9 · 36 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Ancient | 21–1 · 50% | 52.2%▼ −0.4 · 23 rounds · low sample | 64.7%▲ +17.3 · 17 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Anubis | 20–2 · 0% | 33.3%▼ −15.8 · 12 rounds · low sample | 37.5%▼ −13.4 · 8 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
| Mirage | 10–1 · 0% | 16.7%▼ −38.0 · 12 rounds · low sample | 40.0%▼ −5.4 · 5 rounds · low sample | —no vetoes recorded | —no vetoes recorded |
- Cache5 played · 2–3 · 40%CT rounds28.1%▼ −24.6 · 32 rounds · low sampleT rounds47.9%▲ +0.6 · 48 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Dust25 played · 3–2 · 60%CT rounds61.5%▲ +10.5 · 65 roundsT rounds27.9%▼ −21.0 · 43 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Inferno3 played · 2–1 · 67%CT rounds91.7%▲ +40.1 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds40.0%▼ −8.4 · 5 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Nuke3 played · 0–3 · 0%CT rounds55.9%▲ +0.1 · 34 rounds · low sampleT rounds33.3%▼ −10.9 · 36 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Ancient2 played · 1–1 · 50%CT rounds52.2%▼ −0.4 · 23 rounds · low sampleT rounds64.7%▲ +17.3 · 17 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Anubis2 played · 0–2 · 0%CT rounds33.3%▼ −15.8 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds37.5%▼ −13.4 · 8 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- Mirage1 played · 0–1 · 0%CT rounds16.7%▼ −38.0 · 12 rounds · low sampleT rounds40.0%▼ −5.4 · 5 rounds · low sample
Picked — no vetoes recorded · Banned — no vetoes recorded
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
LFO 8 playstyle
Six round-level rates from 352 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is LFO 8; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 51.1% | 30th of 31 | 55.6% |
| T round win rate | 40.1% | 31st of 31 | 49.0% |
| Pistol rounds won | 32.4% | 31st of 31 | 52.8% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 70.5% | 31st of 31 | 73.4% |
| Opening duels won | 47.3% | 31st of 31 | 51.7% |
| Clutches won | 11.8% | 25th of 31 | 13.0% |
LFO 8 roster
The players in LFO 8's most recent match, on 12 Oct 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- ZootNZ22 maps
- ADR
- 71.3
- KAST
- 69%
- K/D
- 0.81
- c4putAU20 maps
- ADR
- 62.0
- KAST
- 69%
- K/D
- 0.76
- SupersAU20 maps
- ADR
- 74.0
- KAST
- 70%
- K/D
- 1.00
- junnMY17 maps
- ADR
- 70.9
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 0.88
- cookieAU11 maps
- ADR
- 75.9
- KAST
- 71%
- K/D
- 1.01
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 12 Oct 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
LFO 8 head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against two regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus LFO 8's going into the match.
- Rooster0–2
2 meetings · opponent rated 82 higher on average
Last:
- MARKandLARRY1–2
3 meetings · opponent rated 47 lower on average
Last:
LFO 8 have not beaten Rooster in 2 meetings, most recently losing on 12 October.
Teams near LFO 8 in the CS2 rankings
Top teams in Oceania
- #27FlyQuest
- #124THUNDER dOWNUNDER
- #208Ground Zero
- #222Rooster
- #223Abyssal
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.