LAG CS2 stats
United States · North America · ratings through 25 Oct 2026
LAG are ranked #129 of 368 CS2 teams, up eight places this week, with a rating of 1,562, 9 points below Marsborne. They have won 9 of their last 14 matches, most recently losing 0–2 to Voca in the CCT North America 2026 Cup 1 playoffs on 25 October.
- CS2 rank
- #129
- of 368 teams
- ▲ 8 places this week
- Rating
- 1,562
- range 1,460 to 1,665
- World rank #109
- Last 14 matches
- 9–5
- last 5
- Map win rate
- 63%
- 40–24 on 64 maps
- last 6 months
LAG rating history
Rating after each match over the last six months. The shaded band is the rating plus or minus two times its uncertainty.
Last updated 25 Oct 2026
- No matches 31 Jul to 29 Aug
- Peak
- Low
View this chart as a table
| Date | Rating | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct | 1,562 | 1,461 to 1,664 |
| 25 Oct | 1,573 | 1,472 to 1,674 |
| 24 Oct | 1,556 | 1,455 to 1,658 |
| 5 Oct | 1,550 | 1,449 to 1,650 |
| 3 Oct | 1,556 | 1,454 to 1,657 |
| 30 Sep | 1,548 | 1,447 to 1,649 |
| 28 Sep | 1,551 | 1,449 to 1,653 |
| 26 Sep | 1,542 | 1,440 to 1,644 |
| 24 Sep | 1,531 | 1,430 to 1,633 |
| 23 Sep | 1,526 | 1,425 to 1,627 |
| 13 Sep | 1,529 | 1,427 to 1,630 |
| 12 Sep | 1,535 | 1,432 to 1,637 |
| 12 Sep | 1,532 | 1,428 to 1,636 |
| 11 Sep | 1,531 | 1,427 to 1,636 |
| 11 Sep | 1,538 | 1,432 to 1,644 |
| 6 Sep | 1,528 | 1,421 to 1,634 |
| 6 Sep | 1,518 | 1,410 to 1,626 |
| 4 Sep | 1,529 | 1,421 to 1,638 |
| 4 Sep | 1,526 | 1,419 to 1,633 |
| 31 Aug | 1,521 | 1,415 to 1,626 |
| 30 Aug | 1,512 | 1,404 to 1,621 |
| 30 Aug | 1,490 | 1,382 to 1,597 |
| 30 Aug | 1,486 | 1,379 to 1,592 |
| 29 Aug | 1,477 | 1,372 to 1,582 |
| 31 Jul | 1,472 | 1,368 to 1,575 |
| 30 Jul | 1,475 | 1,371 to 1,580 |
| 28 Jul | 1,462 | 1,358 to 1,567 |
| 10 Jul | 1,472 | 1,367 to 1,577 |
| 10 Jul | 1,477 | 1,373 to 1,581 |
LAG recent form
Each of the last 14 matches, oldest on the left, placed by how far the opponent's rating sat below or above LAG's before the match.
Last updated 25 Oct 2026
- Win
- Loss
View this chart as a table
| Date | Opponent | Result | Ratings going in | Rating gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Sep | Without a Roof | Lost 1–2 | 1,538 v 1,554 | +16 |
| 12 Sep | Overtake Sector | Won 2–1 | 1,531 v 1,421 | −110 |
| 12 Sep | Iowa Stormboar | Won 2–1 | 1,532 v 1,451 | −81 |
| 13 Sep | Without a Roof | Lost 1–2 | 1,535 v 1,558 | +23 |
| 23 Sep | Zomblers | Won 2–1 | 1,529 v 1,346 | −183 |
| 24 Sep | DETONATE | Won 2–0 | 1,526 v 1,277 | −249 |
| 26 Sep | Overtake Sector | Won 2–0 | 1,531 v 1,431 | −100 |
| 28 Sep | regain | Won 2–0 | 1,542 v 1,395 | −147 |
| 30 Sep | Marsborne | Lost 1–2 | 1,551 v 1,615 | +64 |
| 3 Oct | regain | Won 2–0 | 1,548 v 1,377 | −171 |
| 5 Oct | Without a Roof | Lost 1–2 | 1,556 v 1,576 | +20 |
| 24 Oct | DETONATE | Won 2–0 | 1,550 v 1,330 | −220 |
| 25 Oct | Marsborne | Won 2–0 | 1,556 v 1,612 | +56 |
| 25 Oct | Voca | Lost 0–2 | 1,573 v 1,665 | +92 |
LAG recent results
The latest eight matches, with each map's score and both teams' ratings going in.
- 0–2
CCT North America 2026 Cup 1
Playoffs
- Anubis 11–13
- Mirage 8–13
Ratings going in: 1,573 v 1,665
- 2–0
CCT North America 2026 Cup 1
Playoffs
- Dust2 13–9
- Anubis 13–6
Ratings going in: 1,556 v 1,612
- 2–0
CCT North America 2026 Cup 1
Playoffs
- Ancient 13–4
- Anubis 13–7
Ratings going in: 1,550 v 1,330
- 1–2
CROSSFIRE Season 6
- Mirage 10–13
- Ancient 13–11
- Inferno 11–13
Ratings going in: 1,556 v 1,576
- 2–0
CROSSFIRE Season 6
- Dust2 13–11
- Inferno 13–7
Ratings going in: 1,548 v 1,377
- 1–2
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Anubis 13–10
- Dust2 10–13
- Inferno 9–13
Ratings going in: 1,551 v 1,615
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–7
- Dust2 13–9
Ratings going in: 1,542 v 1,395
- 2–0
ESL Challenger League Season 52: North America - Cup 2
Playoffs
- Mirage 13–2
- Inferno 13–3
Ratings going in: 1,531 v 1,431
Ratings are each team's rating just before the match. Scores are LAG first.
LAG CS2 map pool
The seven maps in the current Active Duty pool, over the last six months. Round win rates are shown against every other team's rate on the same map and side.
| Map | Played | CT rounds won, against other teams | T rounds won, against other teams | Picked | Banned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 147–7 · 50% | 42.0%▼ −9.6 · 119 rounds | 62.2%▲ +13.9 · 127 rounds | 6of 22 | 3of 22 |
| Dust2 | 139–4 · 69% | 52.9%▲ +1.8 · 102 rounds | 59.1%▲ +10.2 · 127 rounds | 8of 22 | 4of 22 |
| Mirage | 136–7 · 46% | 52.1%▼ −2.2 · 117 rounds | 54.2%▲ +8.6 · 96 rounds | 1of 22 | 3of 22 |
| Anubis | 98–1 · 89% | 60.7%▲ +11.4 · 61 rounds | 63.5%▲ +12.8 · 74 rounds | 0of 22 | 4of 22 |
| Ancient | 86–2 · 75% | 52.2%▼ −0.6 · 67 rounds | 58.3%▲ +11.2 · 48 rounds · low sample | 2of 22 | 11of 22 |
| Nuke | 74–3 · 57% | 48.5%▼ −7.5 · 68 rounds | 55.9%▲ +11.9 · 68 rounds | 4of 22 | 3of 22 |
| Cache | 0— | No rounds recorded | No rounds recorded | 0of 22 | 17of 22 |
- Inferno14 played · 7–7 · 50%CT rounds42.0%▼ −9.6 · 119 roundsT rounds62.2%▲ +13.9 · 127 rounds
Picked 6 of 22 · Banned 3 of 22
- Dust213 played · 9–4 · 69%CT rounds52.9%▲ +1.8 · 102 roundsT rounds59.1%▲ +10.2 · 127 rounds
Picked 8 of 22 · Banned 4 of 22
- Mirage13 played · 6–7 · 46%CT rounds52.1%▼ −2.2 · 117 roundsT rounds54.2%▲ +8.6 · 96 rounds
Picked 1 of 22 · Banned 3 of 22
- Anubis9 played · 8–1 · 89%CT rounds60.7%▲ +11.4 · 61 roundsT rounds63.5%▲ +12.8 · 74 rounds
Picked 0 of 22 · Banned 4 of 22
- Ancient8 played · 6–2 · 75%CT rounds52.2%▼ −0.6 · 67 roundsT rounds58.3%▲ +11.2 · 48 rounds · low sample
Picked 2 of 22 · Banned 11 of 22
- Nuke7 played · 4–3 · 57%CT rounds48.5%▼ −7.5 · 68 roundsT rounds55.9%▲ +11.9 · 68 rounds
Picked 4 of 22 · Banned 3 of 22
- Cache0 playedCT roundsNo rounds recordedT roundsNo rounds recorded
Picked 0 of 22 · Banned 17 of 22
- ▲ above other teams: darker is further above
- ▼ below other teams: denser hatching is further below
- fewer than 50 rounds
LAG playstyle
Six round-level rates from 1,074 recorded rounds in the last six months, set against 30 other top-ranked teams. The diamond is LAG; the dashed line is the median.
View this chart as a table
| Rate | Value | Rank among top-ranked teams | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT round win rate | 50.6% | 30th of 31 | 55.7% |
| T round win rate | 59.1% | 2nd of 31 | 48.8% |
| Pistol rounds won | 43.3% | 29th of 31 | 52.3% |
| Rounds won after the first kill | 72.2% | 23rd of 31 | 73.6% |
| Opening duels won | 52.8% | 10th of 31 | 51.5% |
| Clutches won | 15.7% | 1st of 31 | 12.8% |
LAG roster
The players in LAG's most recent match, on 30 Sep 2026, with each player's own figures over the last 12 months, most maps first.
- CrypticUS105 maps
- ADR
- 82.4
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.04
- djayCA91 maps
- ADR
- 74.0
- KAST
- 75%
- K/D
- 0.99
- SandmanUS91 maps
- ADR
- 69.8
- KAST
- 73%
- K/D
- 0.97
- BwillsUS71 maps
- ADR
- 75.5
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 0.99
- SLIGHTUS71 maps
- ADR
- 75.5
- KAST
- 74%
- K/D
- 1.17
Maps, ADR, KAST and K/D are each player's own figures over the last 12 months, from our own match records, as of 30 Sep 2026. Most maps first. A dash means the figure is not on record, never a zero.
LAG head-to-head record
Every meeting in the last three years against five regular opponents, oldest on the left. The average gap is the opponent's rating minus LAG's going into the match.
- Marsborne1–8
9 meetings · opponent rated 153 higher on average
Last:
- DETONATE4–1
5 meetings · opponent rated 216 lower on average
Last:
- NRG0–6
6 meetings · opponent rated 170 higher on average
Last:
- BOSS4–6
10 meetings · opponent rated 79 higher on average
Last:
- Wildcard2–4
6 meetings · opponent rated 148 higher on average
Last:
LAG have beaten Marsborne once in 9, and lost five of the five meetings before their most recent win on 25 October.
Teams near LAG in the CS2 rankings
Closest in the rankings
- #126THUNDER dOWNUNDER
- #127Without a Roof
- #128Marsborne
- #130Entropy
- #131Omega
- #132Drama
Top teams in North America
- #20FaZe
- #24100 Thieves
- #26Liquid
- #33M80
- #49BC.Game
Ratings and ranks are our own calculation from match results. They are not official rankings, and they are not predictions or betting advice.
How to read LAG's CS2 stats
Pull this CS2 data yourself
Rankings, results, maps and rosters over one REST API. Start free with a sandbox key: a fixed sample of past matches, no card. Then one plan, $49/mo for 50,000 requests.